Nacho Beristain on why Canelo lost

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MURK20, Sep 20, 2013.


  1. bmf95b

    bmf95b Boxing Fan Full Member

    5,268
    11
    Jan 9, 2007
  2. stormy

    stormy Live and Learn Full Member

    3,912
    133
    Mar 17, 2009
    Yeah its a tough call dumping your crew who you have been with for so long. If I were Saul I would change to Nacho and try to bring my crew along to learn from someone who is established and knowledgable like Nacho. But it doesnt happen like that in real life.
     
  3. Quincy K

    Quincy K Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,216
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    canelos has to go down to 147 if he is going to have any chance at a long career.

    look how little he is compared to the 6'1" hopkins.

    bernard must be thinking about all the idiots here on this forum that think the diminutive canelito could make any impact at 160.

    prime 160 hopkins would beat up canelo as bad as when saul beat up the 5'3" 110-pound archie solis.
     
  4. stormy

    stormy Live and Learn Full Member

    3,912
    133
    Mar 17, 2009
    But people have been saying that Saul was the bigger fighter and didnt use that size against Floyd.:huh

    Size doesnt seem to be the biggest problem. Movement against a good boxer who controls the distance and uses angles seems to give him problems. Feeding him good tactical information relevent to each and every opponent and better preparing him for battle might not go astray.

    His only loss so far is to a very gifted boxer/mover that was also lighter than him. Rather than change his weight i think he should change and improve his skills to face a boxer rather simply go down in weight. What do you think?:think