Can someone explain in easy terms for me (knows hee haw about boxin) how we come to the conclusion that mitchell deserves a crack at rickys WBO title? A like kevin mitchell, a talked him up and up to ma pals before the katsidis fight and he got mullered, made a right c*nt of me. hes done no bad since getting back on track but surely no..... Rickys been flawless, beat whos been put in front him sh*te or good, done whats required and yet we still talking about mitchell...why, in my opinion he has to do more to get this fight. Would be big fight and the english media would take more of an interest which would help but a think ricky deserves better. Whats the chance of broner moving up or someone like him, someone whos actually deserves it? These are the fights i think ricky deserves. What saddens me about boxin from what i know as its only about money and whats best for the promoters, boxers deserve more as a know for a fact ricky burns wants to fight the best
He doesn't, but him vs Burns sells tickets and brings hype and lines the pockets of Frank more then a good fight against another champion at LW.
A dnt no mate what did he do? people on here were sayin he was no dafty and a former champ so i was happy with this fight
Aside macklin barker / i think this is the biggest domestic fight that can happen. Mithcell sells tickets, and the england scotland thing also sells. Imo mitchell deserves the shot more than Nicky cook did at Super feather!!!!!!!