It's time to name and shame the worst judges for this week. And the this week's award goes to Howard FOSTER, from Usyk Vs AJ. For such a massive fight to be scored so poorly, is simply breathtaking. Obviously Hattons "win" prior to main event was a much worse, but it was judged by ref. So doesn't make the cut. My man Mr FOSTER had it 115-113. That's one RD swing. What fight was he watching???? First two RD to AJ???!! https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/78d55b78-bd82-47f6-921b-190d8eb410dd-1.jpg Time to name and shame. Mr FOSTER must of got Eddie Hearns brown envelope pre fight. Don't want to see him again in any big fights, period. Edit =========== This is the same tit that stopped froch Vs groves I. This content is protected ============
He had Joshua up 2 after 8 and up 1 after 9. He was just shifting rounds. Do not just look at the score. Look at how he scored the rounds. Boxing judge Howard Foster is a corrupt piece of **** that needs to be banned from all judging activities.
This is what you see with many partial judges. Like Kovalev vs Ward 1, where 2 judges scored round 10 for Ward, because it was the point of no return on the scorecards. Strategically scoring is rife in boxing.
I scored it 115-113 and can see a case for 116-112 as I had one round very close. So I don't think it was that bad a scorecard, it's not like he gave it to Joshua or even had a draw. I mean he did a better job than all the judges for Fury/Wilder 1.
Sorry bro. You need to rewatch the fight again. This time probably not drunk. Did you score first two RDS to AJ?
This was easy to score fight. Clear 9-3 for Usyk. 117-111 is the right score. 4,5 and 8. You just can't give AJ more rounds. At best r2 could go even and 117-112 feels allright. Anything else is a biased.
I wasn't drunk, didn't drink at all, I scored first 3 rounds for Usyk. I was also rooting for Usyk. I thought it was a close competitive fight fought at a very high level and the better technician won.