Name for name: Carl Froch resume vs Joe Calzaghe resume

You have lost me a bit with this?
Anyhow lets try and see how you can argue how you think Beyer was winning round 2 against Bika


7:10 - 10:40

This content is protected

 

This is where you get even more ridiculous. So Calzaghe beats Veit and knocks him down and you think thats a 9-9 round or 10-9 round. Comical

So when Reid was questioned for hitting Ottke where many couldnt fathom as to why, you dont think that is an issue. You think Beyer should have been scored a KD against Woodhall but not Reid against Ottke. You are not consistent

Are you forgetting how you said the cut wasnt a headbutt, argued it and then they brought up a video which showed you otherwise

Ignoring how Woodhall was piling it on of course. Beyer could have been struggling to do more as Woodhall was giving him a tough night

you dumb trick yourself with your own statements. Anyway I see you have backed out of answering
Who did you say was out on their feet in that fight?

 

Froch has more depth. Calzaghe the better singular wins..

 

Cleverly is another fake who got exposed horribly as soon as he stepped up to world level, come on.

using Clev doesnt help your case.

 

i am suprised i said that, but if I did I mean hes more of a champ than Jurgen, even though he was definitely a papaer champ was Clev. clev at least tried to step up once.

joshua is paper at the moment, but give him a chance.

in comparison to him sound Brähmer opposition like the who's who of boxing. Or Scott Quigg, [/quote] quigg macarenelli, etc these guys are fake champs. these dont help your argument.

w

 

Goddamn, if Herol had the sort of stamina when Zaggers is involved, with Missus Gee, she'd walk around all day with a grin on her face

 

if u had a brain we'd not have to read your crummy posts. just the way the cookie crumbles.

 

If I had a brain you'd be totally annihilated and would be so embarrassed by my quips that you'd hide under your bed for the rest of your life. As it is, being brainless is still an unfair advantage over you

 

losing it so easy, ok.

 

What now? I was trying to think up something apt and amusing on the other thread, and off go my alerts all the time because Herol's like a little dog biting my ankle It's hard enough to concentrate without trying to decipher your posts

 

still losing it, ok.

 

no, he hasnt. hes the same lying brand as clev.

ha, welcome to the circular reasoning club, where veit is good because he beat jurgen and jurgen is good because he fought veit.

no, they are both mediocre at world level

nobodies.

they ought to have something on a resume after 20 years of boxing.

frampton has just entered the world scene, but hes got more notable wins than clev and braehmer combined.
Give hmi a few more years to make a fair comparison, and your comparison becomes fcuked.

Whats more, Frampton and Joshua have both won real world titles, something Braehmer hasnt done by the age of 37.

hes just become world champ, give him a little more time, as said above.

and dont list losers like this or "can barely outgass a forthysomething" Pulev, it does you no credit.

but should we give Braehmer more time? I tihnk not, father time has called the boat in on his career. and he never delivered.

 

as i maintained? you funny fcuk, I've always maintained they are mediocre at world level. What on earth made you write that?

Clevs not as good as these guys.
And why you still comparing the resume of a 29 year old champ with the resume of a 37 year old never champ?
Seriously? U gotta compare a seniors resume with a newbies? AND STILL LOSE!

 

no, I said they were mediocre at world level.

no, I said they were mediocre at world level.

I did not mention any of these, ONLY YOU have. Although I would agree that only burns (alone) is poor at world level.

you are thick as **** man, Braehmer never had a world title.
There is no point in debating with you further. If I shouted in your directly into your ear this fact you would still repeat the opposite.

again comparing a newbie with a guy finished careerwise. STILL! After beig told you are wrong!

Forget it. dont reply again.

 

groves is your example, not mine. why you using him to argue against me when I havent used him? WHY do you keep doing that, introducing your own examples that have no relation to what I say, and then pretending they are my examples??

Ghulio, my man you didnt listen, - you keep telling me black is white.
There is no point in me arguing with you over that.