Name me one person who Calzaghe has beaten that Hopkins wouldn't have?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Arcane, Apr 7, 2011.


  1. Peppermint

    Peppermint Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,014
    18
    Sep 7, 2010
    I dont think Hops would have lost to him, but Sakio Bika would have given him kinds of problems.
     
  2. irishdjc33

    irishdjc33 Active Member Full Member

    506
    0
    Feb 15, 2008

    :good:lol:
     
  3. taobum70

    taobum70 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,852
    4
    Feb 9, 2010
    Joe never had a real off - night in over a decade, no loss to a fighter he was supposed to beat. Consistency is so underrated in boxing and single wins over an ATG are overrated. Many decent but far from great fighters have a great win on their record, Norton over Ali, McCall over Lewis, Taylor over Hopkins, Thadzi over Toney etc. But who can stay in boxing for over a decade and never be below his best to the degree that an opponent can take advantage of it? Certainly no Hopkins....he was supposed to beat Taylor handily, struggled with an old Winky Wright, lost his very first pro fight. Yes, he has greater names on his resume that Joe, but is beating Trinidad or DHL above their best weight really better than beating Eubank, who afterwards jumped to cruiser and came close to winning a title there?
     
  4. DanishFightfan

    DanishFightfan Boxing Junkie banned

    7,546
    4
    Mar 7, 2011
    Okay... I know im a dane (and obviously a big Kessler fan).
    But i dont think that you should write off a prime Kessler vs an old Hopkins, remember Hopkins always looked best against smaller guys. He lost to Jermain Taylor who i consider to be quite similair to Kessler (However, Taylor may be a bit faster and a bit more aggressive, Kessler on the other hand has better punching power and a better jab).
     
  5. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009
    Not hating on Calzaghe, but he didn't fight a diverse number of styles imo, a lot of the guys he fought were straight ahead kind of guys, where as Hopkins fought people like Winky, Taylor, J D Jackson, Tarver.
     
  6. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
  7. OPBF

    OPBF Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,821
    0
    Oct 25, 2008
    Calzaghe fought defensive fighters, sluggers, speedsters, technical boxers, swarming infighters, Hopkins, boxer punchers, heck, he even fought Eubank.

    Calzaghe fought a lot of styles throughout his career. You just have to watch through all his fights. And it's a pain, because you get to watch his fight with Starie and that was the crappiest fight I ever saw him in.

    In all honesty, I don't believe there's anyone on Hopkins list that Calzaghe couldn't have beaten. Same way around actually.

    So why are we having a fruitless discussion again?
     
  8. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009


    I disagree. The only top fighter Joe fought, that was slick, or a refined type of Boxer, and was at world level, was Hopkins himself, and Idont think he looked particularly good in that fight.

    You could claim Eubank, but Eubank was not a good defensive fighter, he just liked to counter punch, he wasn't hard to find, as he did't like fighting at a high tempo, and his footwork wasn't the best to keep from getting drawn into a fight imo, which is one the reasons Joe was able to get to him and overwhelm imo.

    Starie? with respect, he was a domestic level fighter.

    Winky, Tarver, Taylor, J D Jackson would of given Joe plenty of stylistic issues to overcome imo.
     
  9. One Round

    One Round Hertfordshire's Finest Full Member

    2,964
    15
    Nov 24, 2008
    Debatable, certainly not the Eubank Clazaghe faced.
     
  10. OPBF

    OPBF Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,821
    0
    Oct 25, 2008
    A style is a style is a style. Starie beat Clinton Woods, and also only lost via points against Sven Ottke years later. That's more than just domestic. And even if he was to be considered as one, styles make fights. You can look crappy against a crap fighter and still be good.

    Winky doesn't work hard enough and is too small for JC. You'd end up with a Pac-Clottey or a Williams-Wright one sided decision.
    We've seen Tarver get mauled by Hopkins and Hopkins never fought as hard as JC.
    Taylor looked real bad against a smaller man who used speed and angles on him in Cory Spinks. JC is bigger and will undoubtedly be about as fast and unorthodox.
    JD is too small for Calzaghe in physical terms, Calz is a guy who weighed in over LHW at his fights, and would get bullied to a stoppage.

    In this generation, Hopkins and Calzaghe are the two best guys that can ruin peoples' gameplans and actually have the smarts, size and strength to pull it off. The difference is Calzaghe is busier and faster.

    And it's not like people have ever walked through Calzaghe's slaps. No one has ever walked through them, and he throws a thousand of them so you can't say he can actually be beaten by guys Hopkins wrecked.
     
  11. Justaman

    Justaman Guest

    Probably none.

    But it doesn't take anything away from Calzaghe's carrer (because thats clearly what you are implying...:tired)
     
  12. Bobby Tony

    Bobby Tony Active Member Full Member

    1,278
    461
    Aug 4, 2004
    Roy Jones Jr
    Hopkins only beat RJJ after Calzaghe ruined him
    When they fought, the gulf in class was feckin huge
     
  13. Kingkazim

    Kingkazim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,806
    12
    Aug 26, 2009
    Nobody

    Absolutely NOBODY
     
  14. Kingkazim

    Kingkazim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,806
    12
    Aug 26, 2009
    wow :patsch

    Thats horrific that you think that way. RJJ was long shot before he faced Calzaghe