Naseem Hamed V Manny Pacquiao

Pacquiao knocks him out.

 

Pacquiao lights him up. Just smokes him like a cheap cigar. Naseem Hamed wouldn't last 3 rounds.

 

Pac destroys him.

:yep

 

Hamed flips himself into a ****ing KO, ****ing ****** gymnast with boxing gloves on, nothing more

 

Pacquiao by TKO.

 

Pacquiao would've won on points but would probably have given the Prince a worse beating than Barrera did. The one thing other than power that Naz had was an incredible chin. He was no Khan in that department. He took a lot of punishment from MAB but was never hurt.

 

Don't forget his ******ed over-the-top ring entrances. I'm not a big MAB fan, but I sure the hell was for one night.

 

My only gripe was that MAB didnt KO him that wouldve sealed the deal

 

Here's a more comprehensive thread about it jonoli. more or less every regular here has already voted on it.

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=11124

 

Hamed in his prime was better than Pac, even though Pac had the better career.

 

atsch

if he was better he would've at least made the mab fight competitive

 

it was competitive! 8-4 ifI remember rightly. A 1 rounds blowout is uncompetitive, ie Prescott - Khan. Jeff Lacy - Joe Calzaghe was uncompetitive.

it's incredible what hate does to the memory. Losing 8-4 to a future HOF'er, it's not that bad!

Also, Hamed wasn't in his prime for that fight by a long stretch, the fact he got sick of boxing and retired shortly afterwards is a strong indication of this.

:hi:

 

Puhleez!!! atsch Hamed was infected with the 'sickness' of Marco Antonio Barrera kickin' his ass!!!