Lol. Nas is getting overrated like crazy. Pac would beat his ass at any weight, any day. The guy was so easy to hit and so fundamentally flawed. The last time he fought a elite fighter, he became someone's ***** and retired afterwards.
Hamed actually has a genuine punchers chance in this bout, but only at certain weights. I would still favour Pacquiao in virtually every scenario though.
You can see how criminally underrated Pac is by checking the dates in this thread.. Everybody was pretty much in agreement as to the outcome at the time this thread was made.. Now all these new to boxing kids have their own take.
I didnt vote on the options above because there was no option for " I dont know anything could happen in this fight but it would be a sick fight". At the lower weights you would have to it would be a close fight. Im from Sheffield and was following NAZ's career very closely he actually lives a few miles away from me. I can tell you for a fact that when he fought Barerra his heart was no longer in boxing, and he no longer had the hunger. However Pacman has been a beast at any weight and I think hes aggression and constant pressure would eventually break naz's will and he would crack in the later rounds similiar to the Morales fights.
Naseem, mr. no denfense and no fundamentals vs. pacquiao? arguably the greatest lightweight/welterweight of this generation?!?! :rofl:rofl:rofl GTFOUTTAHERE!!!
Out of the 2 of them, Hamed was the one that was never stopped In fact he fought the whole MAB fight with his hands down Hamed hit much harder than Pacqiauo
Why are people daring to suggest that Naz had a glass jaw? :verysad Naz would pick Pacman apart in the later rounds, the only clear winner here is Naz on points. Naz also has knockout power, how many times has the Pacman been dropped in his career compared to Naz? Naz only lost to Barerra as he fell out of love with boxing, you can see that in the documentary that was made leading up to the fight.