Naseem Hamed V Manny Pacquiao

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JonOli, Sep 22, 2008.


  1. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006
    this has been done several times before. trading with nazz wasa NONO at 126. naz by ko after he goes down to get back up a few time would be a war while it lasted
     
  2. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006
    yeah but we are talking 126 and there pacman was to wild for his own good .
     
  3. bill poster

    bill poster Guest

    I'll go with this but heres my take-

    when was Pacs prime? Is it now (after his recent masterclass) or at his physical peak?

    Pac was too fast for Barrera but Hamed could have caught him- he was an explosive puncher and Pacs chin is not granite.
     
  4. The Phenom

    The Phenom Pretty Handsome Full Member

    4,225
    325
    Aug 30, 2008
  5. ravtrav

    ravtrav Active Member Full Member

    1,413
    0
    Jun 16, 2006
    Pac by ko in 11. Naz would catch Pac early for a kd but Pac would catch up to him in the mid rounds and stop him late!
     
  6. lONGCOUNTED

    lONGCOUNTED I Killed MMA Full Member

    2,003
    0
    Sep 5, 2008

    Then debate my points. Oh thats right... You won't because you can't.
     
  7. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006
    were talking a weight deffernce also . 126 vs 126. NAz would win
     
  8. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    73
    Nov 20, 2006
  9. Monticello

    Monticello Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,012
    1
    Apr 2, 2008
    Pacquiao by late stoppage or decision.
     
  10. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,447
    Sep 7, 2008
    at 126, I have to go for Hamed.

    Pacman was wild at 126, if we're picking his prime as his win in the 2nd fight against Morales (rather than the 3rd when Morales was on his way to being shot) when Morales had just lost to Raheem, then we're crazy. It's the Pacman who beat Barrera the 1st time that Hamed fights;

    and he's wild, open. He tries to swarm Naz (the Naz that K.O'd Kevin Kelley) and drops him a couple of times, but Naz was dropped by heavy punches a few times late on his career and was never dazed. He always got up, and you could see his legs were fine. Being shorter than Pac would help Naseem; I see an uppercut taking Pacman out in the mid rounds.

    I'm a huge Pacqiauo fan, moreso than Naseem, but people's hate for Hamed makes them cloud their judgement. Of all the FW's to beat Hamed, Pacman would be one of the few I wouldn't make a certainty. Sanchez; Obviously! Arguello (maybe COULD K.O Naseem) would also batter Hamed.

    But Pacman was too flawed at FW. A fantastic fighter yes, but showed none of the allr-ound skills he did against (an admittedly overmatched) David Diaz.

    Naseem is a bad matchup for Manny.

    He beats the Naz that fought Barrera/Calvo easily, in a lopsided UD. But not Prime Naz, that is a different animal.
     
  11. theboy_racer

    theboy_racer Boxing Junkie banned

    8,843
    3
    Mar 4, 2006
    Hamed at his best would KO Pac end of
     
  12. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    Pac is a better fighter overall, but he would be waaaay too open to Hamed's shots. Say whatever you want about Naseem, but that dude had BRUTAL power, and you're better off boxing him. I think Pac wins about 70% of the time with speed and workrate, but the other 30% Hamed connects with something spectacular and whacks him outta there.
     
  13. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    i would agree with this post.
     
  14. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    Pacman pts for me.
     
  15. Morrissey

    Morrissey Underrated Full Member

    6,322
    3
    Jun 24, 2006
    Did Pac KO anyone at 126?