Naseem Hamed Vs Floyd Mayweather @128

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Nigel_Benn, Dec 31, 2022.


  1. Young Terror

    Young Terror ★ Griselda ★ Full Member

    7,926
    8,040
    May 9, 2012
  2. Barrf

    Barrf Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,229
    10,944
    Sep 19, 2021
    Mayweather is way too skilled to lose this one. Sometimes on here he seems to not be recognized as the ATG he is. Yeah, I don't like his personality either, but NONE of that takes away a single thing from the fact that he's not an easy fight for any fighter ever, at any weight he can comfortably make.
     
    Thread Stealer likes this.
  3. Saensak Voodoo

    Saensak Voodoo New Member Full Member

    12
    17
    Jun 16, 2023
    Comfortable Mayweather UD
     
  4. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    17,161
    16,924
    Jun 9, 2007
    FM takes this. Hamed was way to fundamentally flawed
     
  5. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,568
    29,220
    Jun 26, 2009
    Floyd toys with Naz, gets bored after a while and sparks him out.

    Then the matchmaker is charged with extreme cruelty.
     
  6. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,625
    38,066
    Jan 14, 2022
    I agree with this but there is a few names i would've liked to have seen Hamed fight.

    Luisito Espinosa
    Juan Manuel Marquez

    I know Espinosa was rated top 2 for a significant number of years, i know it's been suggested by some that Hamed may of avoided Espinosa. I'm not sure i believe that but i feel like Espinosa would've been a tough opponent for him regardless.
     
  7. Greg Price99

    Greg Price99 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,884
    11,884
    Dec 17, 2018
    Of course there are names that, had Naz fought and beat, would have improved his resume. Though that applies to just about every fighter in history.

    My point was that whilst the hype around Naz in the UK at the time may have been disproportionate to his achievements, some people go too far the other way nowadays. Beating 8 x fighters whilst they were ranked top 5 at FW and only ever losing once, stacks up pretty well in historical terms.
     
  8. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,625
    38,066
    Jan 14, 2022
    I wasn't disagreeing with you BTW you know my thoughts on Hamed, I've defended him before even though I'm not a fan of his. I was just saying i would've liked to of seen him fight the two fighters above.

    Without hindsight probably Espinosa was the biggest name Hamed didn't fight. As no one knew at that time how good Marquez would be, he didn't impress vs Norwood in an ugly fight. And really only started to show his real potential in the 1st fight vs Pacquiao by which time Hamed was long gone being retired for a few years.
     
  9. Greg Price99

    Greg Price99 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,884
    11,884
    Dec 17, 2018
    It's ok mate, I know you weren't.

    I don't recall a huge clammer for Espinosa at the time, but he certainly would have enhanced Naz's resume.

    I've not seen enough of Luisito to confidently make a pick. They both fought Soto in 1999, Naz winning and Espinosa losing. At 31 and having previously beaten Soto, Espinosa may have been on the slide by 99, though I believe a Naz, that from what I've heard, was only training for weight making purposes, was too. Espinosa was probably better around 96, but so was Naz.
     
    Dynamicpuncher likes this.
  10. Jon1962

    Jon1962 Member Full Member

    291
    232
    Jan 26, 2017
    The Hamed of 01 was not the Hamed of 97/98 he started to mentally decline.