Nat Fleischer is a hero

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by janitor, May 18, 2008.

  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,550
    Likes Received:
    27,177
    Mr boxing is often criticised on this site for his top 10 lists with some justification.

    Lets not overlook the other aspects of his career however.

    He was a champion of balck fighters in an era where a black man could be lynched for saying:

    "I want my coffe as black and strong as Jack Johnson and my eggs as beat up as Jim Jeffries".

    It is largley down to him that the history of great black champions from the lower weight classes like Dixon and Walcott has survived.

    He was a bastion of integrity in a dark period of American history and as late as the 70s he suported Muhamad Ali's right to the title after he had been stripped.

    Thoughts?
     
  2. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    12,968
    Likes Received:
    2,411
    He plagiarized Richard K. Fox's book on black fighters.
     
  3. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2005
    Messages:
    19,404
    Likes Received:
    278
    Yes, it is commendable that he did so in his era. When it comes to fighters of his youth, he seems very honest in his assesement. I do wonder how much he's seen of Jeffries though, and how reliable those reports are considering that was early in his life when gloved boxing wasn't very developed yet. Perspective of the time is not something that human memory (which is heavily under influence of emotion anyway) takes into account.
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,550
    Likes Received:
    27,177
    You might want to think about how our understanding of boxing history might be different without Fleischer.

    It could only be worse and it would be at the expense of black fighters.
     
  5. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2005
    Messages:
    1,650
    Likes Received:
    13
    Fleischer's achievements were flushed in one fell swoop when he decided to interfere in Ali-Liston II
     
  6. BIG DEE

    BIG DEE Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    Messages:
    522
    Likes Received:
    5
    BIG DEE HERE= WEALTHY ELITE, YOUR AN ASS. Nat Fleischer was one of the great figures in boxing history and at the time of his death in 1972. Nat Fleischer saw every heavyweight champion fight from James J Jeffries to Joe Frazier. To top it off seen future heavyweight champions fight, George Foreman, Ken Norton and Larry Holmes and at ringside no less. Yet a pip-squeek ass like you who`s never seen a damn thing in his life say`s he IRRELEVANT. YOUR AN ASS WITHOUT A BRAIN. I`VE HEARD A LOT OF DUMB
    THINGS ON THIS SITE SINCE I CAME BACK BUT THIS IS THE MOST ABSOLUTE IGNORANT THING I HAVE EVER READ. YOU SIR ARE IRRELEVANT
     
  7. BIG DEE

    BIG DEE Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    Messages:
    522
    Likes Received:
    5
    BIG DEE HERE = He got involved because he did want another Dempesy vs Tunney long count. But you are right as it has hurt his standing in history with the younger generation. Nat should have let the fight continue as maybe
    Ali would have had a clean KO instead of one that smells even to me today of a thrown fight. I have always thought that Liston flopped in that fight as the punch he got hit with was to be generous weak and wouldn`t have KOed a
    bantamweight much less a man with an almost Iron chin at that stage in his career.
     
  8. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2004
    Messages:
    23,666
    Likes Received:
    2,148
    Nat Fleischer loved Boxing, I used to go up in his office, Ring magazine when I was a kid it was a block or so away from the Garden. They had casts of fighters fist, Primo Carnera's looled like King Kong's...When I would see him alone in his office I would go in and talk to him. He would talk about guys like Ketchel,McCoy,Langford,Johnson,JEFFIRES,Dempsey,Louis....he did not think much of Ali at the time and he knew something was wrong ( a dive) just did not want a scandle,,,Shame when his Brother in Law Nat Loubet took over, he let John Ort run things and Don King started paying for rating's...when Nat F. was there he was as honest as could be...but he was an amazing guy..who could take you back and bring the old days to life and the fighters
     
  9. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2007
    Messages:
    55,255
    Likes Received:
    10,354
    Good post.
     
  10. bigjake

    bigjake Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,385
    Likes Received:
    9
    i have 10 ring boxing encyclopedias,there maybe a few mistakes in them but for the amount of facts they contain it doesn't matter.still the best record books out
     
  11. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2004
    Messages:
    12,059
    Likes Received:
    3,561
    I agree here. He did a great deal for boxing and his penchant for bias (and unrealism) for old timers is insignificant to how much he loved the sport. A great boxing man.
     
  12. OLD FOGEY

    OLD FOGEY Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    7,670
    Likes Received:
    98
    I second this.
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    97,720
    Likes Received:
    29,067
    Agreed!
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    97,720
    Likes Received:
    29,067
    I feel Fleischer did as much for the integrity of boxing as any man that ever lived.
     
  15. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2005
    Messages:
    6,315
    Likes Received:
    664
    I dont see much grounds for anyone here criticizing or dismissing his all-time lists.

    As noted, he favours old-timers who dont survive on film, or only survive in grainy fragments, so it's not within any living person's memory to have any real ammunition to heavily criticize his picks.

    In fact, in the absence of extensive and clear film of the fighters of that era, Fleischer's opinion should be considered among the evidence we use if we seriously want to make a judgment and set about rating those fighters in an all-time list.