Nate Cambpell suffered a vitreous hemorrhage

If you are talking Nate vs Juan diaz where the ref ruled the cut came from a headbut that was incorrect. The replay shows that the cut came from a punch.

 

Yes those guys are warriors. No doubt about it but we are talking about different injuries here. Nate was not complaining about blood driping in his eye. He said he was seeing spots. the Klitchko, jones, and diaz cuts all came from a punch. Not sure about the others.

 

I have seen worse headbutts (which caused MUCH worse cuts) without a vitreous hemorrhage resulting as well. What I do know is that punches have caused every horrible boxing tragedy, or serious/permanent injury that I can recall in boxing was caused by punches as well. So... I am wondering where the logic behind your point is.:huh Punches have shown to be much more damaging than headbutts in the sport of boxing. Headbutts are simply known for their superficial damage... such as the cut that Campbell received. Every eye injury (not cut related) that I can recall in boxing as came from a punch as well. Such as detached retinas, ect.... things of that nature.

 

i think it should stand but a rematch is in order i feel....it was a wiered fight that never took off to me i didnt see campbell or bradley take off.

it was a nish fight. and shoudl be rematched

 

Perhaps but that does not mean that this but did not cause the Hemorrhage. Ive seen punches , and buts that look harder then others but its hard to judge the damage. You cant say a nasty headbut cant do the same damage as a punch.

 

No, but since it was originally called as being from a punch, there needs to be convincing evidence that it was caused by a butt for the CSAC to overturn it. I personally think there's enough evidence, but I can see why they might not.

 

AND since you can't just say, then the TKO win for Bradley is justified.

 

blood in the eye around my ends is nicknamed "dangerous ****". main reason why they stop fights isnt about the loss of blood or the amount of blood that going. it's blood entering the eye or the body. if it gets into your eye that can be it for your depth perception. if it goes into your mouth you will be throwing up and can poison you if you swollow enough of it.

 

I don't know what Nate Campbell suffered.....and I'm not sure what Witter suffered either.

All I know is that I suffered in the watching of it.

 

I disagree the ref screwed this one up. After the but happened it was obvious that it hurt Nate. He was complaining about it trying to get the refs attention. The ref didnt do anything. Nate said clearly after the but happened he was seeing spots.

 

So basically, we both believe Nate quit, but for different reasons lol...

 

This.