Nate Cambpell suffered a vitreous hemorrhage

A rematch should happen. Very unlikely.

 

California commission rarely over turns anything. Bradley should give Campbell a rematch strictly for honor...lol

 

i agree
as boxing fans we see guys land massive bombs on one each other with no ill effects...then a slow 1-2 can be the end of a guys night. why? the other punch landed faster, on his chin...yet he isnt out :huh yet a right cross just off his temple has him on ***** street.

chaos theory i guess.

still ma point is that a seemingly harder headbutt would maybe been nothing. yah semme:blood

 

Stop trying to stir people up. The fight wasn't called correctly and should have been a ND or NC bottom line. The injury was serious enough to halt the fight and given the fight didn't make it past 4, the rules are clear....it's a NC.

 

yea i see your point which is why i am pointing out nates reaction after the but happened. Watch how nate reacted. nothing really landed after the but to warrent his reaction.

 

Nah brah...it's common for blood to get in the eye but NOT BEHING the eye. Which was the case with Nate

 

Yes Dan Rafael said it best. The Ref needs to look out for the safety of both fighters. Not just the home town fighter.

 

Nate pussied out, but regardless of this fact it should still be reversed to a NC. Even if the re-match happens i see Bradley giving him a real TKO on Nates record.

 

Possibley Bradley looked really good. I was really looking foward to seeing who the better man was. It looks like we will never know.

 

You wouldn't freak out if you suddenly went blind in one eye?

 

Hilarious. ESB suddenly has 50 different certified ophthalmologists.

I'll take Nate's word and his doc's, thank you.

 

Who honestly thinks Campbell quits if the 3rd round went the other way around and it was Campbell hammering Bradley up against the ropes??? And who thinks he quits if the cut was clearly caused by a punch???

 

Nate definitely quit. I am not bashing on him for doing so.

What I am saying is that the result is a justified TKO and shouldn't be a No Contest.

Also... if I am being honest... I still think that it was rather obvious that Nate quit purposely before the 4 rounds could be completed so that he could get a No Contest. The fact that he was ten times more worried about that than he was about his "sever eye injury" is proof of that. Watching him in the ring... he didn't seem to be to be displaying any effects of this eye injury. I'm not a doctor, that just my take on things. If it was his possible permanent vision damage that he was worried about... don't you think that he would have been just a bit more interested in letting people take a look at his eye, and getting medical attention? From the moment he turned around after the bell he was lobbying for the fight to be stopped, and for the fight to be ruled a No Contest. That's just my honest opinion on the matter.

However... I am not one to bash on a fighter for quitting under those circumstances. It's just that what I saw in the ring... then what I read from his statement... the injury that he is suggesting doesn't match up with the recovery time that he is suggesting either. I don't want to bash the man... I guess you can just consider me suspicious of the whole ordeal.

 

Fair enough. You can be suspicious but it is an obvious no contest based on the rules. The injury was caused from a but. That was very obvious.

We cant read minds but the doctors gave a diagnosis and he explained the symptoms.