Nate Cambpell suffered a vitreous hemorrhage

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by eze, Aug 3, 2009.


  1. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004


    Yes and No.

    It depends how you see it.

    All in all, it probably will be a TKO because there's no proof it was the head butt.

    But Nate quiting wasn't taking the easy way out.
     
  2. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Yes you are right . . . it might still be a TKO but still a rematch should be in order to clear the air of the controversy.
     
  3. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Exactly.
     
  4. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Of course you do, are you ****in serious? :patsch You think knowing where the sun sets is a legit comparison?

    Here's a clue...doctors go through YEARS OF READING to know HOW to make those calls. You're a no education/no job/living w/ mommy and daddy punk....the **** do you know about anything?

    ONLY a doctor who properly diagnosis the injury can give his "PROFESSIONAL OPINION" on the severity of the injury.
     
  5. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    The doctor said there was blood behind his eye.

    That only leads to one thing.

    :lol::lol::lol::lol:
     
  6. Swann

    Swann I'm secretly Marc. Shh... Full Member

    1,222
    0
    May 11, 2009
    did you even watch the fight?

    the doctor said nothing of blood being behind the eyes when he was looking at nate.

    LMAO at eze not even being in college, jobless, and living with his mom. no wonder he's on this site 24/7
     
  7. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    Go watch the telecast and get back to me.
     
  8. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    No, because you're adding all this extra theatre. It's cheap to use health and bodily function like that.

    Don't try to brow beat people into agreeing with you by playing the "blindness" card. That's just horrible, man.
     
  9. Swann

    Swann I'm secretly Marc. Shh... Full Member

    1,222
    0
    May 11, 2009
    the doctor says "it's not the cut"

    nate says something like "doc, i can't see"

    and then the doctor said "oh you can't see? we have to stop it."

    tell me when the doctor said anything about blood being behind the eyes. maybe mommy was changing the channel of your house and you must've missed it. :lol:
     
  10. JMMisking

    JMMisking Member Full Member

    166
    0
    Jul 18, 2009
    Rough luck on Nate to catch a serious head butt. Ref was totally wrong to call a tko. Would it not be a good idea to use video replays in limited circumstances such as whether a headbutt causes a cut, or whether a foul contributed to a ko or knockdown?
     
  11. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Nate Cambell is 100% spot on, as he usually is when he doesn't involve race

    if medical reports indicate that he had a vitreous hemorrhage, then its an open and shut case.
     
  12. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    Campbell looked more worried about getting a loss than he did about his eye after fight.
     
  13. Swann

    Swann I'm secretly Marc. Shh... Full Member

    1,222
    0
    May 11, 2009
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRaYE8dUvPQ

    go to 2:00. when did the doctor diagnose campbell with blood being behind the eyes?

    according to reports, the doctor stopped the fight because he saw bleeding behind the eye. tell me where, because i can't see it.
     
  14. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Far more worried. :nod Most agreed, BB.
     
  15. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Look simpleton....it's not a forgone conclusion that the butt was responsible. If Campbell claims he cannot see...ONLY if the butt is the determining factor IS a NC warranted before 4 rounds are up. Quit being so ****in dense....:patsch