I really find it hard to see Nate getting Bradley after seeing Bradley handle the power from a stronger and bigger Holt. I really can't see Nate backing Bradley up. I'm worried that when both guys meet in the middle of the ring and start trading, it is going to be Nate that is hurt.
What is so funny? Nate gasses in later rounds and Bradley is just a punching machine with decent pop there is a possibility of a TKO
I find it so funny that people are giving Bradley a chance. He's not a top fighter. Nate is gonna knock him out. He's so basic. He's like a generic trash bag. You see right through him and know what he's gonna do.
:roflatsch. He was almost knocked out by an uninspired Kendall Holt, and Kendall ain't a knockout artist.
As opposed to Nate who has countless losses including 2 stoppage losses to Robbie Peden who got schooled silly by an old MAB
Or to put it another way, he was dropped by a big counter right on the button, took the count and went straight back to work, backed Holt up the entire fight and out fought a bigger, stronger guy. Bradley is damned good.
You already have a conclussion even before the fight happens . . . that sounds more of a ready excuse. Bradley out punched Witter (5'7"), Edner Cherry(5'8") and Kendall Holt(5'9") in his last three fights are you expecting him to be out punched by Nate Campbell who strugled against Juan Diaz(5'6") to win via SD and Funeka (6'1") to win by MD? Nah nah nah :nono . . . sure he needs to KO Bradley because if not . . . he's gonna be eating leathers all night long.
lol you either didn't see the fight or don't know **** about boxing! And I'm leaning towards the latter... Bradley was nowhere near knocked out in that fight!
I'd pick the younger Bradley in this one, in a highly competitive bout, though I am expecting a very game and motivated Campbell to give it all.