Nate Campbell is an excellent fighter, very underrated.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Amsterdam, Mar 4, 2008.


  1. Illmatic

    Illmatic Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,062
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    i cant say that I know enough about alcine to agree with you, but simms is extremely talented, but he takes rounds off, gets lacksadaisical, and he's inactive. waste of talent.
     
  2. Illmatic

    Illmatic Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,062
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    mayweather has 100x the ring intelligence that judah has. Call mayweather what you want, but he has immense ring intelligence.
     
  3. Illmatic

    Illmatic Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,062
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    knowing how to win rounds is not something that comes naturally to most fighters...thats why so many fighters think theyve won every fight even though its clear to everyone theyve lost
     
  4. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    guys don't forget that there is a big difference between Spinks and Bruseles. Floyd wouldn't be dumb enough to joke around against Spinks
     
  5. Illmatic

    Illmatic Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,062
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    well, spinks is a world-class fighter, and mayweather is smart. Judah is stupid enough to do such dumb ****.
     
  6. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    The only thing that concerns you is the fact that Pac isn't and never will be a Supernatural.
     
  7. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,540
    83,358
    Nov 30, 2006
    I don't know...

    :think He did seem to be throwing straighter punches and sitting down on them more against Julio...when I first saw him, I saw a sloppy, noisy, featherfisted mess with no upside but chin and workrate (not exactly enough to give me chills) and I've been waiting and hoping for someone to hand him an L ever since. That chin and workrate, however, have carried him far enough to seem unbeatable at lightweight. Loathe to admit it, but I must. I'll probably never enjoy watching him, but I can begrudgingly acknowledge his superiority at 135.
     
  8. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    Keep them hands up Nate Mayorga!
     
  9. PacDbest

    PacDbest Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,181
    1
    May 7, 2006
    Is he a God????:yep
     
  10. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    No, Mijares is God and Pac's not even as good as Joe Calzaghe, who's currently a lesser fighter than Mijares at his advancing age.:good
     
  11. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,540
    83,358
    Nov 30, 2006
    Nate Campbell is an excellent fighter; very good boxer - but inconsistent and faded.

    Juan Diaz is a guy lucky enough to have some distinct physical advantages over much of a division whose few elites are on the decline.

    This win will not make him an excellent fighter or a good boxer...it will make him still what he has been all along - a determined and lucky (and, yeah, hard-working) guy.
     
  12. Tuavale

    Tuavale Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,703
    3
    Mar 16, 2007
    Nate is very tough, and skilled. Diaz may be special. But just heard DK resigned as the Baby Bull's promoter and King DOES have a piece of the Galaxy Warrior. Is controversy brewing?:smoke :smoke
     
  13. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    That's the best description for the Galaxy warrior at this point. :good