Nate Campbell vacates WBA title!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by FINITO, Jan 10, 2009.


Page 1 of 4
  1. FINITO

    FINITO Guest

    After funeka, he wants the winner of marquez/diaz and then he's obligated to face barrera.
     
    FINITO, Jan 10, 2009
    FINITO, Jan 10, 2009
    #1
  2. Jason997

    Jason997 Active Member Full Member

    1,309
    1
    Nov 4, 2006
    All fighters should vacate the WBA title.
     
    Jason997, Jan 10, 2009
    Jason997, Jan 10, 2009
    #2
  3. sprika2

    sprika2 Active Member Full Member

    1,211
    0
    Apr 28, 2006
    really?
     
    sprika2, Jan 10, 2009
    sprika2, Jan 10, 2009
    #3
  4. FINITO

    FINITO Guest

    Yea he did the right thing by dumping that trash belt. At this stage of his career, he can't waste anymore time fighting mandatories like Paulo moses or whatever his name is.

    I have a funny feeling about this Funeka fight though. It's a dangerous fight.
     
    FINITO, Jan 10, 2009
    FINITO, Jan 10, 2009
    #4
  5. OBCboxer

    OBCboxer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,949
    226
    Jun 2, 2007
    Campbell is ducking Moses? :lol:. They'll be Moses nuthuggers in no-time.
     
    OBCboxer, Jan 10, 2009
    OBCboxer, Jan 10, 2009
    #5
  6. MilesP

    MilesP Member Full Member

    488
    0
    Dec 16, 2005
    guess that means it'll be Joan Guzman vs Paulus Moses for the belt then.
     
    MilesP, Jan 10, 2009
    MilesP, Jan 10, 2009
    #6
  7. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    Smart move by Campbell, these ridiculous mandatories and interm title junk is holding unification back.

    Campbell's plan is to fight Funeka, Barrera then the winner of JMM/Diaz.

    Sounds to me Campbell has the best plan to make FOTY 2009 if he were to win all those fights.
     
    Boom_Boom, Jan 10, 2009
    Boom_Boom, Jan 10, 2009
    #7
  8. OBCboxer

    OBCboxer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,949
    226
    Jun 2, 2007
    Funeka is a live underdog and I hope Campbell isn't overlooking him for greener pastures.
     
    OBCboxer, Jan 10, 2009
    OBCboxer, Jan 10, 2009
    #8
  9. OBCboxer

    OBCboxer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,949
    226
    Jun 2, 2007
    Yes he does. How do you see Campbell vs Barerra?
     
    OBCboxer, Jan 10, 2009
    OBCboxer, Jan 10, 2009
    #9
  10. SouthpawSlayer

    SouthpawSlayer Im coming for you Full Member

    16,351
    2
    Sep 6, 2008
    thought this would happen
     
    SouthpawSlayer, Jan 10, 2009
    SouthpawSlayer, Jan 10, 2009
    #10
  11. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006

    Its a winnable fight for Barrera, but Campbell is a fighter on a mission Ill pick him by close decision.

    He could very well be the Bernard Hopkins of the lightweight division, he started his career late so in terms of his boxing age, hes still young :thumbsup.
     
    Boom_Boom, Jan 10, 2009
    Boom_Boom, Jan 10, 2009
    #11
  12. lv lurker

    lv lurker fly on the wall Full Member

    6,168
    133
    Mar 15, 2008
    i wonder if this means guzman vs the former junior lightweight wba belt holder....

    valero?
    bad fight for edwin if that be the case.
     
    lv lurker, Jan 10, 2009
    lv lurker, Jan 10, 2009
    #12
  13. OBCboxer

    OBCboxer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,949
    226
    Jun 2, 2007
    Right. I think some of the troubles he had early in his career are gone.
     
    OBCboxer, Jan 10, 2009
    OBCboxer, Jan 10, 2009
    #13
  14. CLUBBER

    CLUBBER C.R.A.B. BOXING Full Member

    7,372
    555
    Sep 14, 2008
    Cant wait to see the Funeka fight...
     
    CLUBBER, Jan 10, 2009
    CLUBBER, Jan 10, 2009
    #14
  15. CLUBBER

    CLUBBER C.R.A.B. BOXING Full Member

    7,372
    555
    Sep 14, 2008
    Dangerous fight for Nate...the way Funeka destroyed Raheem was frightening...
     
    CLUBBER, Jan 10, 2009
    CLUBBER, Jan 10, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 4