Nath has an Iron Chin

He's got a china chin just like his fellow countryman Calzaghe. Both love hitting the canvas.

 

So the answer is he fought one fighter over 40 (Calzaghe himself was weeks shy of 40 for every fight in his career so that doesn't really count)

And that one fighter, went on to win a world title so the answer is 100%

Berol pwned again. :hi:

 

no two.

please make a new thread if you feel the need for another topic.

and more importantly stop ruining this nath thread with your calzaghe propaganda and take clev's loss like a man instead of whining about it.

 

not far from the truth but lets stick with Nath.

 

So you are saying 39 year old Jones was 40 something :rofl:rofl

Was Calzaghe not 40 something to because he was 36?

 

aha u r claiming 40 year old jones wasnt shot......IN A NATHAN CLEV LOSS THREAD???

Bullshyt mr han man, have some respect. start a new thread.

 

When he was 40 he might have been shot, because of course this was some time after Calzaghe ruined him.:hi:

And the only reason you comment on this thread, or any other is to hate on Calzaghe :hi:

 

absolutely DISGUSTING of you to keep mentioning joe in clevs hour of loss.

 

So how many 40 somethings has Joe fought Berol.
:think

 

2 now please stop hans,you have disrespected clev enough.

have some pride in your brit heroes like me and stop spoiling there threads.

 

Name the 2 and include their ages please. I want to see numbers over 40. :hi:

 

jones ages 40 minus 3 weeks
Hopkins age 42


something to cheer up hurt Welshmen -

[url]http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p034mq5q[/url]

 

So Jones wasn't 40 something at all. And Jones' birthday is one the 16th on Jan....but he fought 'Zaggers on the 8th of Nov.

Maybe you struggle a bit with Maths. If you don't know what 40 is, think of 80 then half it.

So to answer my question you shamelessly ducked "Zaggers fought 1 fighter over 40, who went onto win a world title, when 'Zaggers was at the very end of his career. Hurts doesn't it that butt of yours Berol. :hi:

 

so you continue to squabble about a matter of days in the magnitude of 40 years, and in doing so disrespect Nath Clev greatly.

you disgust me.

 

Your the one who keeps claiming 'Zaggers fought 40somethings (plural).

If Jones was 40 something at 39, then why was "Zaggers not 40 something at 36? :think

Why was he not 40 something when he fought Eubank in 97? :think

Why was he not 40 something when he made his debut? :think

At what point do you become 40 something (not just plain 40 either, 40 something) :think