NAZ Vs PAC

Do you think all British fighters are over rated?

 

Naz is not a certain coward like somebody.

 

i think larrios stunned him in round 3. and i honestly believed larrios could have finished him right then and there, but arum casted his spell.

 

This kind of **** post is annoying.

Kinda like saying if Henry Cooper can put Ali on ***** street, then Foreman kills Ali. atsch :roll:

Pac had been on ***** street too against Nedal Hussein but does not mean ****.

The main question here is can Naz land on Pac solidly to put him on ***** street. Pac had been with bigger punchers and was able to take their shots. Pac would have fought Naz with different approach than he did against Marquez or Hussein.

 

I really can't see Naz beating Pacquiao. Not a good match-up.

 

Featherweight non-juicing Pac destroys the never was Naz in a fistic mismatch.

 

Who did Pac fight that was a bigger puncher than Prince? :huh

I think Manny probably TKOs Hamed but that statement is a bit puzzling.

 

//

 

Naz was the actually the queen, as Barrera was the king.

And Pac was the ace :yep

 

Hatton, DLH, Cotto, Mosley, Margarito

 

Hmm thats a tough one. Hamed at feather was almost unbeatable there for a while, until MAB of course. But I gotta go with Pac via UD possible TKO. Hamed was too open to be hit with his hands down, and Pac has the speed to catch him. Hamed however when caught with his hands down, which DID happen, seemed to take it just fine. So again, tough match, but I got Manny in this one.

 

Im goin Pac i think it would be a hell of a fight though.

 

Naz' only chance is catching Manny with something big that Pacquiao doesn't see coming.

If they fight 100 times, Pacquiao probably wins at least 90-95.

On the bright side, it would definitely be entertaining.

 

Your post is,quite honestlly,insane.Just what performance(s) and what victim(s) of Hamed's would indicate that he would have beaten Pacquiao(Put him to sleep,)?Robinson,Kelley,Sanchez,Johnson,etc....?This is just ****ing crazy!!Please enlighten us and explain to us which one of Hamed's victims is even remotely close to Manny Pacquiao?Naz was "a king" at featherweight?He fought a whole bunch of decent,but limited alphabet "champions" that only indicate one of boxing greatest problems:too many organizations in order to justify their sanctioning fees.And when he fought the 1st true elite opponent,he got his ass absolutely kicked at 27,fought one more time,quit,and the rest of us still have to listen to or read the many (unjustified)excuses of why he didn't beat the one elite that he faced.I'm not even a "Pac Lover".But I'm still waiting for you and your ilk to introduce ANY evidence whatsoever that Hamed was remotely as good as you claim he was!!!!!!OR THAT HE WOULD HAVE BEATEN MANNY PAC!****ing absolute joke.

 

"Almost unbeatable there for awhile"?Well considering his decent,but nothing special comp at that time,I guess the moment would indicate that that might be true.