Nazim defending Pacquiao

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Gander Tasco, Apr 24, 2010.


  1. nhojrem

    nhojrem Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,436
    0
    Jan 4, 2009
  2. Marcelo

    Marcelo Guest

    me too my old friend. where is my pm.
     
  3. Hooch

    Hooch Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,831
    0
    May 26, 2009
    I honestly believe Floyd is at least 90% to blame, what right does Floyd have to demand tests that are not mandatory?? I dont blame Paq and co for walking away, Floyd is not the face of boxing or anything like it and even if he was the rules are the rules and have feck all to do with him and his team. I see what you are saying though and I wish Paq had just done the tests but I dont see how they are both to blame.

    Paq's excuses for not taking tests are irrelevent. If Floyd dont like the rules he should go play tennis or something. Before you say it i'm no nuthugger and have no aliegence to either fighter, as ive stated Floyd is all wong for Paq imo and would win by about 4 rounds but he knows its a dangerous fight and has ****ed it all up for everyone. He is a complete tool, great fighter for sure but a massive massive tool.
     
  4. Toontoon

    Toontoon Boxing Junkie banned

    8,177
    1
    Jan 8, 2010
    If I was Pac I'd have taken it as a compliment and passed the olympic style testing just to prove I'm genuinely that good.

    That's if I was clean.
     
  5. zchen

    zchen Active Member Full Member

    1,453
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    :rofl:rofl
     
  6. igotJUIC3

    igotJUIC3 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,619
    1
    Jun 28, 2007
    see this right here is utter bullshyt....and if you dont understand why pac's comments and actions are relevant then yea there really is nothing to talk about.
     
  7. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    :good
     
  8. eko718

    eko718 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,804
    0
    Jan 15, 2010
    You have NO IDEA WHATSOEVER why I'm saying it because I didn't give my reasons. How can you then assume I 'have a personal agenda' or its because he's 'beating people up'? Seems more like you have an attachment to Pacquiao and the idea of him not being above reproach frightens you.
     
  9. Malik

    Malik Just bumping and reading Full Member

    285
    0
    Feb 3, 2009
    Seriously, who are the ****s who said he is on something?
     
  10. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    OR THE BIT34 MANNY IS ON SOMETHING..FUC4ING STUPID DUMMY COULD SHUT EVERYONE UP BUT FOR SOME REASON DONT TAKE THE TEST..FUC4ING IDIOTS THE ONLY ONES WHO BELIEVE HIS BULLSH!T LIES....FU34IN DUMMY IS ON DRUGS:deal
     
  11. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    GrAHhagejajeGLealdSldAGHH???!!. Is that you Floyd Sr?
     
  12. ciscobox

    ciscobox ..ı|ı...ı|ı.. Full Member

    2,444
    0
    Apr 17, 2010
  13. madkillaz692000

    madkillaz692000 Fuerte y Abundante Full Member

    3,492
    0
    May 3, 2009


    :deal
     
  14. Knives7

    Knives7 Boxing Addict banned

    7,196
    1
    Jan 24, 2009
    Yea, and the Mayweathers' "opinion" is law! :lol::rofl
     
  15. hooligan

    hooligan Millionaire Bum Full Member

    4,499
    10
    May 8, 2006
    can someone tell me the exact words of nazim...cant seem to understand some of it...dunno if he is dissing pac....