Bradley is a bit of a mixed bag I can honestly see him being 0-4 @ WW or arguably still unbeaten now. People leave out Pac I, JMM, & Provo were all SD's meaning one judge saw it the other way. Here comes the controversial part. Real talk even though i originally scored for Manny, last time I watched Pac-TB II I felt the same way I did when I finally went back and watched the first fight. Pac-TB II could easily be a draw, as far as rounds scored they really won the same amount of individual rounds, imo I thought rd 1was a draw and if you scored it a draw technically Bradley could of won that fight 6-5-1.. I was shocked myself even reaching that score, only thing I can definitively say about Bradley is he knows how to adapt & has a lot of heart. His size might eventually be his downfall, but he's a live 50/50 vs any top 10 WW. Bradley is borderline if he isn't HOF quality yet 2-3 more solid wins should edge him just into that atmosphere (Chaves doesn't count).
Watch the Mayweather fans argue that Bradley isn't warranted induction (because Pacquiao beat him), while arguing Gatti and Canelo are to pad out Mayweather
0-0 in Lineal title fights in his career is interesting... But he has a deep resume with several top names (Alexander, Peterson, Witter) as well as his top victory (Marquez) being a good one. And he's only been in two fights you can say he lost (Pacquiao X2). Some people scored the Provodnikov fight against him but I didn't and that war plus being in fan friendly fights in general (in my opinion; others find him boring) seems to boost his chances as well.
Yes he definitely belongs there. The man has the heart of a lion and is always willing to fight the best.
One of the best resumes out there, and I said that long before he fought Pac. He cleaned up the than loaded Light Welter divison, and now has an outstanding win over Marquez who was coming off the big Pac KO.