neither of these fights means anything

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by boxingstar1, Apr 3, 2010.


  1. boxingstar1

    boxingstar1 Member Full Member

    188
    0
    Feb 18, 2010
    I havent ordered this fight and wont because its a joke.

    now heres why this fight makes no sense.

    when they fought first the arguement from hopkins fans (rightly so I think) is that Hopkins hadent reached his prime yet.

    Roy fans's counter with ages right? Hopkins was 3 years older when they fought so CLEARLY Hopkins was closer to his prime than Jones:roll:

    this fight I'm certain Roy fans will say "Roy was past his prime" and Hopkins fans will counter with ages. "Hopkins was 3 years older so CLEARLY Jones was closer to his prime than hopkins:nut

    the fact is that neither of the fights these two have fought(are fighting) mean a damn thing in the bigger sceme of things.

    Time will be the only thing that will tell who was truely greater.

    My money's on Hopkins, but they both belong on the higher parts of the lists.

    Hopkins based on resume, and Jones based on Talent.