New ESPN P4P rankings. . .

:deal

 

I don't think that Bradley should be absent from the top10. A close defeat to Pacquiao will not put you out of the list if you otherwise has a case for being top10. He belongs there, somewhere around the bottom.

 

The context is Wlad's longevity and dominance isn't getting it's proper due when Ward and Rigo, who haven't had a meaningful win in years, are ranked over him P4P.

As I said, that's just Wlad's knockouts in championship fights. Old school on the way up has nothing to do with it. It's been 2 years since Ward or Rigo have had a win worth talking about. If we were playing the old school resume game, it's worth noting Wlad's resume depth blows theirs out of the water.

 

And, lest I be accused of being biased, GGG shouldn't be above hin, either.

 

There are no good P4P list because its always only opinion. I would put Wlad #1, Pacquiao #9, Kovalev #3, Rigondeaux #4 and Golovkin #5. Bradley shouldn´t be on that list. Ward is also suspicious.

 

Out of 55 proboxing writer 52 of them had pac the winner average of 117-111 score. Only 3 scores it for Bradley.average 115-114 score. FYI

 

I won a nice amount betting Bradley by decision, but he didn't deserve that.

 

"Earlier than that" as in he was def top 3 before Marquez.

 

thats is the hypocrisy of it all. :rasta

 

This list just leaves me scratching my head.

 

Wow, just awful...

 

espn, list is suspect now.

 

Solid guys in the list the bad thing is the order of those fighters.

 

The quality of his opponents have been quite high for 15 fights.