New Floyd Mayweather Interview: No 14 day window next time

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rapid, Feb 13, 2010.


  1. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    I'm for both those clowns getting KTFO!!!
     
  2. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    Red flags?:huh

    If turning down what could have been 40 million dollars is'nt an admission of guilt, then nothing short of the actual scientific evidence is.

    I'm not one of those that needs actually scientific evidence to know what actual common sense intelligence can tell me.

    Scientific evidence is for an actual court of law to find a person guilty.........
    Out in the real world you use you common sense judgement......and anyone with a brain (of which includes *******s) already know what Pacroid is hiding.
     
  3. NeckBreaknAiken

    NeckBreaknAiken Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,014
    4
    Jul 30, 2008
    :good:good:good:good:good This.

    People are so hateful towards him, they refuse to even look at it from his angle. And at the same time, Pac is so likeable, people refuse to entertain the notion that he might wrong. Especially against a douche like Mayweather.
     
  4. arsabs

    arsabs Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,743
    0
    Nov 8, 2008
    its bloodtest that never caught anyone. as of urine, theres a lot. does it not mean anything?
     
  5. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    NSAC urine testing does not test for HGH or EPO
     
  6. arsabs

    arsabs Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,743
    0
    Nov 8, 2008
    "guilty until proven innocent", that about explains above.
     
  7. arsabs

    arsabs Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,743
    0
    Nov 8, 2008
    did i say NSAC? read what i quote.
     
  8. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    relevance....look up the word
     
  9. arsabs

    arsabs Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,743
    0
    Nov 8, 2008
    point is random bloodtesting is good for HGH,of which up to this very moment have not caught anyone. do you think Pac is on HGH? tell me about your reason if you do. dont tell me that he is on EPO for urine is very much the way to detect users.
     
  10. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    No one has to prove that Pacroid is guilty, he's done a fine job doing that all by himself.


    You cant prove a man guilty that does'nt show up to proceedings.......when a person does'nt show up in a court of law, he's automatically pronounced guilty as charged!:deal
     
  11. errsta

    errsta Boxing Addict banned

    6,321
    1
    Jul 31, 2004
    I was just being nice :good
     
  12. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    the point is....even with random urine testing (by the NSAC), THE NSAC DOES NOT TEST FOR EPO
     
  13. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Which is the testing that Pac wants. After he originally agreed for the USADA to do it.
     
  14. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    seems very rice and fishy to me
     
  15. arsabs

    arsabs Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,743
    0
    Nov 8, 2008
    point is they were looking for another neutral party to do the testing during negotiations,not just NSAC. again, what do you think is Pac into? what kind of PEDs?