**New Jacobs interview.. Very good. Call Golovkin Absurd. Says how he'll fight Canelo**

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IsaL, Apr 15, 2019.



  1. HerolGee

    HerolGee VIP Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,015
    Sep 22, 2010
    jacob cannot beat elite, he cant even beat titlist level yet.
     
  2. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    49,586
    16,968
    Oct 7, 2006
    Maby people felt he beat Golovkin.
     
  3. HerolGee

    HerolGee VIP Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,015
    Sep 22, 2010
    ok so golovkin is proven titlist level by beating lemmy.

    but it was close, thats all. Jacobs did not prove he can beat him.
     
  4. Holler

    Holler Doesn't appear to be a paid matchroom PR shill Full Member

    12,502
    23,631
    Mar 12, 2018
    Great interview. Danny is a class act.
     
  5. MorvidusStyle

    MorvidusStyle Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,802
    4,589
    Jul 11, 2017
    GGG already has the perceived and the official W over you, Jacobs, so he doesn't need to fight you. You are not unified champ if you beat Canelo, so using a hypothetical future unification as proof he is ducking you is rather absurd. The unification has less importance now because of the following:

    GGG has a perceived win over Canelo, but no official W. Canelo's cheating and corruption to get the results would clearly motivate any fighter to get revenge. Canelo is the far bigger pay day also. GGG has limited time left.

    See if you can get your friend Algieri to do that math for you, as you're clearly not the sharpest tool in the shed.
     
  6. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,543
    7,418
    Aug 1, 2012
    Well Jacobs may not be the sharpest tool in the shed, after all he's said numerous times that he had GGG beating Canelo in not only the first fight but in the rematch as well.
     
  7. Tomato(e) Can

    Tomato(e) Can Emmanuel Dapidran Pacquiao. banned Full Member

    6,300
    5,629
    Feb 19, 2018
    A few Floyd and Canelo fans, maybe.
     
  8. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    91,176
    25,466
    Jan 18, 2010
    Golovkin wanted to be the UNDISPUTED 160 king, he already was the unified king.
    The only belt missing was the WBO one and that one is still missing after Jacobs vs Canelo.
     
  9. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,543
    7,418
    Aug 1, 2012
    He was also never Lineal. You can't be Undisputed without being Lineal.
     
  10. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    91,176
    25,466
    Jan 18, 2010
    Tyson was for 4 fights. He even got introduced for his fight against the the "lineal champion" Spinks (who had to walk first of course) as the undisputed champion, just like in his couple previous fights.

    edit: And if Joshua and Wilder fight before either fights Fury (again), then the winner would be undisputed and lineal according to some publications but not to others. It's something that has little value, because the "lineal" title nowadays often means the duckers title (like Spinks back in the day in my Tyson example).
     
    Last edited: Apr 16, 2019
  11. tee_birch

    tee_birch Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,522
    4,511
    Jul 6, 2014
    Canelo will stop Jacobs IMO so no need to be worrying about this
     
    Birmingham likes this.
  12. PunchersChance.

    PunchersChance. Active Member banned Full Member

    1,050
    1,020
    Nov 30, 2018
    Jacobs beat GGG and got stiffed on the cards in his hometown. More flush power shots vs more clean jabs. He absolutely deserved a rematch and has every reason to be frustrated at Team GGGs flatout refusal to entertain a rematch.
     
  13. HerolGee

    HerolGee VIP Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,015
    Sep 22, 2010
    whilst i agree he was never lineal, so what if you hvae 3 titles? isnt 3 titles near enough in this day and age.

    Now if you have argued that 3G only won one of them, then you'd have an argument.

    You must admit that lineal is a bit of a joker in the pack, more of an award, down to the sheer nature of the rules governing it.
     
  14. Birmingham

    Birmingham Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,076
    6,776
    Jan 13, 2017
    The reason is they don't want to see a fighter getting slagged off with agenda's, the likes of you and Isal clearly have agenda's, you think people will let it slide ?? Foolish
     
  15. Birmingham

    Birmingham Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,076
    6,776
    Jan 13, 2017
    He lost clearly to the point he couldn't get a dodgy decision in his home town even :risas3: