New meaning for the "wbc" if and when floyd wins it again

:rofl

 

Negative on this..

Your items that your trying to use to back your argument is flawed....

Sure he "could be" using PEDS..but cmon now man...the guy is begging for tests..

This is a very weak argument when it comes to the testing..horribly weak as a matter of fact.

Nice opinion though:good

 

He makes a good point though, this guy retires for a while and comes back bigger than he was. Then he starts talking about PED use by someone who has never failed any kind of test. Floyd is probably just jealous that Pac is so much better than him even after he has retired to PED up :yep

 

lmfao:nut

wow u *******s are desparate..

CMON NOW..YA'LL TALK ABOUT how cocky Floyd says he is...THEN U COME BACK WITH "O HE THINKS PAC IS BETTER SO THATS WHY"

UR REBUTTAL TO MY POST WAS PATHETIC.

YOUR A ******* THATS USUALLY THE CASE WITH EM..

*******S

1. IGNORE FACTS

2. DOWNGRADE VALID INFO

3. PAY 0 ATTENTION TO ANY ARGUMENT THAT IS NEGATIVE TO THEIR OWN.

4. DO NOT ADDRESS FACTS SHOWN TO THEM, IN REBUTTAL TO THEIR ORIGINAL RESPONSE

5. INSULT THE POSTER, RATHER THAN FOCUS ON THE ARGUMENT AT HAND; BY DOING THIS THEY LOSE THE ARGUMENT EASY AS THEY DONT EVEN ADDRESS THE ARGUMENT THEIR OPPOSITION IS PUTTING UP.

6. COME UP WITH OFF THE WALL $HIT WITH NOTHING TO BACK IT, JUST TO MAKE THEMSELVES LOOK LIKE THEY SAID SOMETHING VALID; MANY TIMES THIS OFF THE WALL $HIT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH BOXING.

YOUR GUILTY OF NUMBER

1

3

AND 6:deal

 

Valid info? Where did you post valid info? Where did I insult you? What "facts" did I ignore? While you guys keep saying that "Pac should agree to the test" well here you go, so now I don't want to hear that from you guys anymore ok?


[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ku4jfLKD0Mg&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PL154AFC26E9530AF6[/ame]

BTW what's your highest level of education?

 

Lol..You were owned when you suggested that the other poster was putting valid facts up.

I graduated from California Western School of Law in 2010.

DON'T FOCUS ON ME THOUGH..NOT WITHOUT MAKING IT BOXING ORIENTED AT LEAST (SUCH AS I DO WITH THE PACTARS.THIS A FUKIN BOXING WEBSITE...I COME HERE TO CHAT ABOUT BOXING AND OWN POSTS SUCH AS THE ONE YOU JUST GAVE ME.

MY EDUCATION IS NOT IMPORTANT MAN..:deal IM HERE TO TALK BOXING..NOT TO INSULT AND TALK $HIT (UNLESS I KEEP IT BOXING ORIENTED BUT THATS DIFFERENT)..

I AM HERE TO DEBATE AND OWN WEAK ARGUMENTS OR POSTS SUCH AS THE ONE U WROTE IN RESPONSE TO WHAT I TOLD THE OTHER POSTER.

 

If you want to fight the best, take the ****ing test!

 

If you want support from your Nation stop going on Vacation :hey

 

No ****ing way in hell you graduated law school. Your arguments are **** No one who graduated law school would talk like you, NONE!

Oh and "making a good point" is a lot different from "valid facts"...or did you not learn that in law school? :yep

 

How do you know *******? You're the same guy who referred to a black poster in the lounge as a ****** and think all Floyd fans are uneducated. I see your subtle racism in your posts *******. I'm on to you *******.

 

Not to get into your business but seriously you have made some racist comments about mexicans so I guess it takes one to know one

 

So it's ok for you guys to be racist and I call Bald a ****** (never knew thinking someone is dumb as a ****** is racist) I'm a racist? **** you. And yes you *****s are ignorant, just read your posts FFS...I also don't see how that's racist. So I'm gonna quote another poster on here...Shut the **** up "Chimp_C"

And trust me I know. Sd can barely write a coherent sentence, how the **** is he gonna graduate law school? And his arguments make no sense, yet he thinks he's made a great point. He'd be laughed out of law school should he try to even attend one.

 

When *******? I've seen you make racist comments about blacks and Asians. Hell today or yesterday you said something racist about Asians.

 

Sorry to tell u but its the truth..DONT ASK IF U DONT LIKE IT DUMMY..

TYPICAL ******* AGAIN

*******S

1. IGNORE FACTS

2. DOWNGRADE VALID INFO

3. PAY 0 ATTENTION TO ANY ARGUMENT THAT IS NEGATIVE TO THEIR OWN.

4. DO NOT ADDRESS FACTS SHOWN TO THEM, IN REBUTTAL TO THEIR ORIGINAL RESPONSE

5. INSULT THE POSTER, RATHER THAN FOCUS ON THE ARGUMENT AT HAND; BY DOING THIS THEY LOSE THE ARGUMENT EASY AS THEY DONT EVEN ADDRESS THE ARGUMENT THEIR OPPOSITION IS PUTTING UP.

6. COME UP WITH OFF THE WALL $HIT WITH NOTHING TO BACK IT, JUST TO MAKE THEMSELVES LOOK LIKE THEY SAID SOMETHING VALID; MANY TIMES THIS OFF THE WALL $HIT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH BOXING.

IN THIS FORUM, YOUR GUILTY OF
1
2
3
4
5 AND 6

AND THERES NOTHING MORE I CAN DO THEN ANSWER YOUR QUESTION DUMMY..

DONT FUKIN ASK IF U DONT LIKE THE ANSWER YOUR GONNA GET..

I DONT GIVE A FUK IF U BELIEVE ME EITHER..HERE TO TALK BOXING...TOMORROW I'LL BE GOIN TO WORK WETHER YOU BELIEVE ME OR NOT SO SHUT THE FUK UP AND TALK BOXING ON THIS BOXING WEBSITE..

DONT WORRY ABOUT ME AND MY LIFE DUMMY:deal

TYPICAL ******* RESPONSE-GUILTY OF 5 AND 6..

U SHOW HOW IGNORANT YOU ARE BY TRYING TO FOCUS ON THE POSTER, RATHER THAN ON THE DEBATE AT HAND BTW...FUKIN WEAK A$$ ARGUMENT..

U DONT SEE THAT SIMPLY SAYING "YOUR NOT A LAWYER" IS NOT A VALID REBUTTAL...

NICE TRY THOUGH..GOOD LUCK NEXT TIME DUMMY