New Ring P4P list

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by AJ5, Dec 11, 2012.


  1. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    hehehe dumbass
     
  2. tito44

    tito44 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,585
    6
    Oct 25, 2009
    I'm not sure of that list is real or not. Guerrero is not in the top 30.
     
  3. Keitaro2187

    Keitaro2187 Member Full Member

    218
    0
    Nov 17, 2012
    broner and guerrero are way to high on the list especially broner, i like broner but being demarco who wasnt even on the list doesnt make you #5 lol GTFOH
     
  4. Beezy

    Beezy 2 Eazzy Full Member

    4,486
    1
    Jul 31, 2010
    I know man... dang.. GBP not hiding nothing anymore... I'm a Broner fan but number 5 is crazy... try number 15 or 16.... or at best 11 or 12 and that's a stretch.. but number 5? Dang... he's gonna get there soon but they junped him extra early.... Oscar's becoming corrupt
     
  5. Beezy

    Beezy 2 Eazzy Full Member

    4,486
    1
    Jul 31, 2010
    But why are people hating on Ward's spot? He was just number 3.... nothing wrong with him being number 2... I understand if you put Marquez ahead.. but Ward could be argued as NUMBER 1 for real.... but Brone is the mistake to me.. as well as Guerrero.. and Bradley has always been a mistake on that list... this list lost credibility in a huge way
     
  6. conraddobler

    conraddobler Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,853
    147
    Mar 7, 2010
    Dawson's best win is arguably against Adamek.
     
  7. tito44

    tito44 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,585
    6
    Oct 25, 2009
    I don't have a problem with Carl froch being above Kessler. Even so Kessler beat him without a doubt the first time and would do it again.
     
  8. DoktorSleepless

    DoktorSleepless Member Full Member

    296
    0
    Nov 20, 2010
    Okay, according to the new ring article, Chuck Giampa is soley responslbe for the p4p list and the rest of the ratings board has zero input. I did not know that. Pretty ridiculous.
     
  9. AJ5

    AJ5 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,642
    0
    Mar 29, 2010
    Chuck is on quite a fail streak

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InEETt4GNOk[/ame]
     
  10. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
  11. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,029
    27,662
    Jul 26, 2004
    This really sucks..... I have been a Ring defender somewhat for some time, and I like to use their rankings as some sort of... barometer I suppose.

    But seeing Broner at 5 is a disgrace.

    Pretty pathetic from Ring.

    Theres no defending Broner at 5.

    And how they have Guerrero or Broner over Mares beats the hell out of me.

    Boxing fans dont agree on much, ever. But when everyone agrees that thats one of the shittiest lists theyve ever seen, you know youre ****ed up.
     
  12. SouthChicagoRay

    SouthChicagoRay Active Member Full Member

    691
    12
    Dec 17, 2010
    I don't have a problem with that list at all except for Guerrero on there.
     
  13. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,029
    27,662
    Jul 26, 2004
    Ya no problem with Broner above Donaire and Mares :lol: ya ok :rofl
     
  14. crimson

    crimson Boxing Addict banned

    5,899
    0
    Dec 8, 2009
    Not sure how Broner goes above Donaire and others. That is just too much.
    Pac might be slightly too high.
     
  15. BadDog

    BadDog Active Member Full Member

    1,345
    3
    Oct 12, 2012
    I think if Floyd would be dead for 10 years they'll still keep him at number 1.