broner and guerrero are way to high on the list especially broner, i like broner but being demarco who wasnt even on the list doesnt make you #5 lol GTFOH
I know man... dang.. GBP not hiding nothing anymore... I'm a Broner fan but number 5 is crazy... try number 15 or 16.... or at best 11 or 12 and that's a stretch.. but number 5? Dang... he's gonna get there soon but they junped him extra early.... Oscar's becoming corrupt
But why are people hating on Ward's spot? He was just number 3.... nothing wrong with him being number 2... I understand if you put Marquez ahead.. but Ward could be argued as NUMBER 1 for real.... but Brone is the mistake to me.. as well as Guerrero.. and Bradley has always been a mistake on that list... this list lost credibility in a huge way
I don't have a problem with Carl froch being above Kessler. Even so Kessler beat him without a doubt the first time and would do it again.
Okay, according to the new ring article, Chuck Giampa is soley responslbe for the p4p list and the rest of the ratings board has zero input. I did not know that. Pretty ridiculous.
This really sucks..... I have been a Ring defender somewhat for some time, and I like to use their rankings as some sort of... barometer I suppose. But seeing Broner at 5 is a disgrace. Pretty pathetic from Ring. Theres no defending Broner at 5. And how they have Guerrero or Broner over Mares beats the hell out of me. Boxing fans dont agree on much, ever. But when everyone agrees that thats one of the shittiest lists theyve ever seen, you know youre ****ed up.
Not sure how Broner goes above Donaire and others. That is just too much. Pac might be slightly too high.