New Ring P4P: Pac, PBF, JMM, Donaire, Shane...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Sweet Pea Pacquiao, May 4, 2010.


  1. 8count

    8count sidekick Full Member

    1,788
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    it's ****ing Mythical... that p4p ranking. so i can understand everyone arguing.

    Look at the bright side the top 2 dogs can fight in the same weight class! yey!


    btw... I'd like to know the rationale behind Donaire's inclusion.
     
  2. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Front on what? Is there an age restriction on being a belt holder? Last time I checked the only requirement was being able to pass the physicals and being bad enough to win. Last time I checked Mosley passed with flying colors.

    Age is irrelevant. Ask people who got whooped by Big George, B-Hop, and Glen Johnson. What matters is you RANKING!

    Man I swear you guys are like chicks. :yep
     
  3. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    Still no Wlad? Shane and Donaire top 5?

    Well, at least they had the chutzpah to shake up the lower part of the list a bit. It's a start.
     
  4. DemolitionDan

    DemolitionDan ATG and HoF Full Member

    17,643
    10
    Jun 29, 2009
    Wow, P4P is just an opinion and everybody has their right to have one, but wow. The Ring has the shittest P4P ranking I've seen.
     
  5. PugilisticPower

    PugilisticPower The Blonde Batman Full Member

    7,846
    35
    May 4, 2008
    No, I wasn't impressed by any of those things because Hatton had already been schooled and KO'ed by Floyd Mayweather Jr previously and hadn't looked anywhere near as good since.

    Cotto again, obliterated by Mosley and scraped past Clottey - damaged goods.

    ODLH? Weight drained and old.

    I was more impressed by Pacquaio beating Clottey. That represented a guy who had taken some pretty good guys very close, had not been obliterated, was unlucky to lose to both Cotto and Marg.
     
  6. JLocs

    JLocs Guest

    **** THAT is what everybody is SAYING. I GEUSS THEY know pac is going out the DOOR and they dont know WHAT TO DO ABOUT THERE NEXT SUPERSTAR:lol: they still got BOOM BOOM...
     
  7. madkillaz692000

    madkillaz692000 Fuerte y Abundante Full Member

    3,492
    0
    May 3, 2009
    it would be nice for some of u here to apply for a position as the Ring's analyst.
     
  8. JLocs

    JLocs Guest

    WHAT RINGS ANAL:huh
     
  9. Leon

    Leon The Artful Dodger Full Member

    40,234
    13
    Mar 14, 2010
    They should have took pac's #1 spot away from him while he was still active as a way to hurt his ego. Maybe they could have peer pressured him into signing the contract.
     
  10. caneman

    caneman 100% AllNatural Xylocaine Full Member

    16,472
    1
    Aug 5, 2009
    Oh really? I recall you had a this long pre-fight analysis and prediction of how Pac would not be able to handle Cotto. Pac destroyed Cotto. Now that victory is not impressive or even worth mentioning to you?
     
  11. o_money

    o_money Boxing Junkie banned

    11,894
    1
    Apr 8, 2006

    Honestly, p4p in my opinion is turning into ajoke. Like I wouldn't rate half these losers on here.
     
  12. Simple100

    Simple100 Active Member Full Member

    1,329
    0
    Apr 10, 2008
    :good
     
  13. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    Donaire does not deserve to be number 4....
     
  14. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    That seems to be the one point that brings everyone agrees on!
     
  15. el mosquito

    el mosquito Boxing Addict banned

    5,805
    0
    Nov 20, 2009
    i'd like to see montiel in there. but i agree with pac being at number 1 and floyd at number 2