New Ring P4P Ratings: Bradley at #3

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Ripper11, Oct 15, 2013.


  1. Peril

    Peril The Scholar Full Member

    9,183
    664
    Jan 6, 2011
    Should be something like this:

    1. Floyd Mayweather
    2. Guillermo Rigondeaux
    3. Andre Ward
    4. Wladimir Klitschko
    5. Mikey Garcia
    6. Sergio Martinez
    7. Timothy Bradley
    8. Juan Manuel Marquez
    9. Manny Paquao
    10. Danny Garcia


    The ginger and the wanna be floyd have no room on this list.
     
  2. Ripper11

    Ripper11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    2
    Apr 21, 2011
    I'm a big fan of Mikey, but I think he's too high on your list currently. I have no doubt that he'll reach that level though in the future
     
  3. tito44

    tito44 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,585
    6
    Oct 25, 2009
    He has a more rightful place than Canelo and especially Broner.
     
  4. Ripper11

    Ripper11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    2
    Apr 21, 2011
    I agree, but he hasn't accomplished as much as fellow undefeated fighters like Bradley and Danny Garcia
     
  5. MoJoGoodie

    MoJoGoodie Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,905
    118
    Nov 29, 2011
    Why is Rigo number 2...explain that:think
     
  6. Peril

    Peril The Scholar Full Member

    9,183
    664
    Jan 6, 2011
    Because he fought the #3 p4p guy and schooled him in a convincing fassion. Everyone thought Donaire was the top dog of the division and he was regularly top 5 on just about everyone's p4p list. In his 12 fights he had nothing but dominant performances, against very solid opposition.
     
  7. TJ Max

    TJ Max Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,300
    345
    Jun 2, 2013
    shouldn't you have Donaire in the top ten?
     
  8. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,152
    27,878
    Jan 18, 2010
    Seriously man... what happened to the Ring rankings?! :patsch

    Dougie Hauser was right with his rant some time ago that we should forget about P4P lists altogether because this is complete bull of course.
    It has been used by GBP to hype their fighters like many fans feared would happen when they took over the magazine.

    Garcia not in there with Broner at 8 and Alvarez at 9... that's just sad.
     
  9. Peril

    Peril The Scholar Full Member

    9,183
    664
    Jan 6, 2011
    Technically yes, and he will be once Martinez is out due to inactivity
     
  10. Vergilius

    Vergilius Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,220
    3
    May 29, 2010
    Borderline insane to have Broner or Alvarez - but no Garcia. It just don't get the line of thinking.
     
  11. Peril

    Peril The Scholar Full Member

    9,183
    664
    Jan 6, 2011
    Lets face it...ring magazine sold out. You can't be unbiased and be owned by a boxing promoter, its absolutely impossible.
     
  12. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,457
    1,835
    Sep 9, 2011
    a million times this, that list is a ****ing embarrassment to the once good name of the ring
     
  13. Jonesbones

    Jonesbones Member Full Member

    292
    0
    Aug 20, 2013
    only fighter in the right place is mayweather, ward is a good fighter but 2nd ? bradley 3rd? well well suits him coz seems the 3rd judge in his contests always goes with him. who does this list , ring magazine, who are owned now by golden boy mmm? and if they are done by fighters records where is the wbc h/weight champ? strange plus garcia ,now i know why its referred to as a mythical title
     
  14. The Wanderer

    The Wanderer Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,815
    23
    Mar 28, 2008
    Wlad being that high and Broner and Alvarez being on the list at all are disgraces.
     
  15. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    That is outrageous. :rofl

    The ring has turned into a complete joke.