http://www.ringtv.com/ratings/ Cotto is gone. Glad to see Calderon in there. But seriously Cabalerro and Drachinyan are better P4P fighters that Cotto? :think
Not even worth talking about really is it. Surely they'll be no-one on here who agrees that Cotto isnt top 10 p4p ? Is there ??????????
I always wonder why they put Caballero in there.... :huh Cotto, Dawson and even Paul Williams should be on there above him.
what a disgrace :-(...Hatton is so overrated its not even funny. guess its because they go by latest achievements? and since Cotto lost (?) well they decide its ok to take him off the list? unbelievable...
All 3 losses were very close and his wins have been against p4p 10 opposition. Caba-****ing-llero? Is beating Molitor these days all you've got to do to be top 10?
Hatton is the linear champ at 140. You complain about Hatton, but have no problem with Darchinyan and Caballero? :roll:
Darchinyan has been more impressive than Hatton lately I suppose. These Ring ratings are very reactionary.
Cotto won his last fight, and his "loss" was overshadowed for obvious reasons. Like I said to the other poster, Hatton has a legitmate claim to be a P4P elite. Why focus on Hatton, when there are clearly others on the list who don't have half the claim that he does.