New WBO Heavyweight rankings make no sense

The overall quality level of everyone apart from Usyk & Fury is so low that rankings really don't matter anymore. Any one of the 'top ten' beneath those 2 could beat anyone else and it wouldn't surprise me at all.

Helenius could rematch Wilder & KO him, would not shock me one bit.

 

Aren't Interim Champions treated as World Champions, why is Hrgovic number #10 since he is IBF Interim champion?

 

Those rankings are garbage. Hrgovic loses 5 spots for beating Zhang. Joyce stays put and Joshua ascends for beating a bum. Wilder should not have replaced Hrgovic as Zhang is a much better opponent than Helenius.

 

It's the least credible governing body anyways

Wbc > ring > wba > ibf and wbo below them

 

The IBF should be higher. They actually call for good fights for the mandatory shot. Usually the fighters end up turning them down though. The other ones keep giving out of shape mexicans shots or give some barely top 100 fighter from Don King's stable a title shot after his latest bung.

 

We take it seriously because it impacts the fights that are going to happen, but we don't take it seriously in determining who the better fighters are.

 

I think because some people don't even count Ring. What are your thoughts?

 

Now you are beginning to understand.

Do you think the WBO belt has any meaning?

 

Only rankings with any kind of credibility is Ring magazine. The sanctioning bodies all have agendas so their rankings are trash.

 

Anyone willing to throw enough money at an abc org can get ranked.

 

The WBA are a complete joke, I've heard Fres Oquendo is still pushing a lawsuit against them forward. He's still demanding a shot at the 'regular' title, the title they robbed off Charr.

 

I disagree.

Ring/TBRB>IBF>WBO/WBC>WBA

The WBA is the very worst.
The WBC and WBO are equally very bad, while
The IBF is somewhat better.
The Ring and TBRB have the most credibility.