Newest Teddy Atlas Interview on Floyd-Manny

WHY you crying out wanting people to help you or something.hey LOP are you conafused why you wait for me to log OFF HA WEIRDO every body knows you cuz you a PUNK.you think i back off from a fight that will be the DAY be PROUD OF WHAT YOU ARE THAT IS A PINOY AND STRAIGHT UP PAC FAN.stalking you wish HA YOU ***

 

Did Titty At-l-ASS blame the Devil? Pat Robertson, yes, it must be Pat Robertson!

 

Seems it's now a TRADITION with some sports personalities to say whatever they want BUT at the END of the DAY they CAN'T PROVE a **** on what they are saying!:silly:hat

 

Void was convicted of misdemeanor battery in 2004 after an altercation with two women. When is Roger's trail for beating up a woman?

Titty did not mention that.

 

you're better than that divac.

you know that it's not all about money. jmm didn't rematch pac though he could've get much more money than fighting john in indonesia. does that mean that jmm was afraid of pac? or jmm just didn't want to submit on pac's conditions/demands (purse split)? pac and floyd have offers and counter offers, and neither of them wanted to submit on it. it's an ego thing

 

You're lying to yourself if you think for one second that walking away from 30 million is about ego.......

I'll be very blunt with you my friend because I believe me and you have always debated in a civilized way....
honestly, through Manny Pacquiao's actions, its no longer speculation with me, I'm convinced he's a PED user.

Take a look at this video piece from another thread. The piece covers it pretty nicely about the whole Pacquiao-Mayweather doping controversy.

...here's the link.....
http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=200101

I

 

that's proof enough for you?

:yep

 

1+1=2 is more than enough proof for me, indeed.

 

Don't even go with the whole standing on principle argument. It can't be about principle because Manny made compromises and concessions. Manny is/was willing to take the tests on his term, so it cannot be about the principle of the matter. If you ask me to rob a bank, I will say no based on principle and my belief that stealing is wrong. I won't say, "How about just a credit union?" "Maybe an ATM?"

That said, Manny wanted a 30-day cutoff, and Floyd wanted random testing all the way up to the fight. So what did Floyd do? He met in the middle and suggested a 14-day cutoff. Manny said no. Manny countered with 24 days, and Floyd stuck with the fair, middle ground of 30 days.

Can somebody please tell me what difference 10 days make? Is 10 days your principle? What could possibly change in 10 days? It's like he needs a month or so for something... I wonder what it could be. Hmmmm.

 

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...-detected-hgh-in-an-athlete-usada-backs-urine

end of debate..floyd pussied out..deal:deal

 

any floyd boys want to refute the facts presented by the link?

 

well my point is, neither fighter wanted to submit their selves, to one's term/condition. floyd said random testing, manny refused and asked for a 30-day cut-off. floyd said 14 days, manny counter offered with 24 days. floyd refused. this just indicates that they don't want to go under one's demand. if pac agrees the 14-day cut-off then we have a fight, or if floyd accepts the 24-day cut-off the fight will surely push through.

 

thesmokingm has a very good argument regarding that video

 

FYI, Armstrong was a doper. Former roommates, teammates, and girlfriends all have testified to this. He also has tested positive...

 

Doper? you mean weed? Or you talking PED?