Newsflash idiots: Sturm won that fight (and I'm irish)

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by withoutwire, Jun 26, 2011.


  1. bizzer07

    bizzer07 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,246
    1
    Dec 11, 2007
    Did you even see the fight or are you just trying to start an argument off?! Thats a ridiculous score fairplay. At worst this fight was a draw, nothing less though, i had Macklin by 2 rounds. For any judge to score Sturm 4 rounds up, a turn around of possibly 8 rounds, is insane, heads need to roll for these kind of **** decisions :tired
     
  2. sonyt

    sonyt Member Full Member

    422
    0
    Mar 23, 2008
    i had it draw, Macklin was more active and Sturm hit harder and more accurate.
     
  3. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,422
    1,681
    Nov 20, 2007
    Do not try to argue, a close fight in Germany is automatically a "ROBBERY! KRAUT ****S DID IT AGAIN! GERMAN JUDGES (there weren't any :lol:) SHOULD BE BANNED! FOKIN DISGRACE!" etc.

    It was an either way type of fight with many close rounds, Macklin had a higher workrate, Sturm the better connect %, in the end I had it for Matthew by a single point and I'm cool with the split call, that's about it.

    Macklin should've won the championship rounds, he didn't, and that's where it went away. Do a rematch becuase it deserves one, but people should freakin' stop the robbery cries, because when a GENUINE happens, it won't make a damn difference to the average bloke who reads "robbery" either way.
     
  4. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    I had it 115-113 for Sturm. Not even close to being a robbery. It was a fair decision.
     
  5. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    I hate Green but Green handed BJ his ass. Flores got outboxed, outpunched, outlanded