Newspaper decisions

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by psychoshane, Jan 20, 2011.


  1. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,647
    18,471
    Jun 25, 2014
    I'm sorry. I'm not going to humor trolls anymore.

    You don't follow boxing.

    You don't care about the rules of a fight.

    You don't acknowledge official decisions.

    You've never covered a fight live. You don't attend fights. You've never officiated a fight. You've never boxed.

    Your "expertise" seems to be just rekeying descriptions from newspapers that don't exist anymore (so you don't get sued) of old fights no one alive has seen (including you) and passing those descriptions off as your original work.

    Apparently, all you do on this board is regurgitate old articles you've saved from defunct papers, insist you spend tens of thousands of dollars on "rare" fights that are so rare you can't even name them, and then you hurl personal insults at anyone who doesn't buy your "con."

    I'm done with you. If you were a likable or humorous troll, I'd continue humoring you.

    But as far as I can tell, nobody on this board can even stand you. And I'm now one of them.

    Try to bait someone else.

    Bye troll.
     
  2. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,647
    18,471
    Jun 25, 2014
    A good journalist can spot a fraud.

    Sorry, you've been spotted.

    I'm putting you on "ignore" now.
     
  3. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,433
    Feb 10, 2013
    Too bad you only attended journalism school and never finished. Otherwise you could actually call yourself a journalist and recognize the fraud in the mirror.