Nicholas Walters Confirms He Would Lose to Vasyl Lomachenko

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Gannicus, May 4, 2016.


Page 1 of 2
  1. Gannicus

    Gannicus 2014 Poster of the Year Full Member

    13,452
    2,990
    Mar 4, 2014
    "You know what the odds are fighting a fighter like Lomachenko. You're not going to beat him on a decision; you got to knock him out. I fought (Jason) Sosa and I beat him clearly and they called it a draw. What do you think if it was Lomachenko? I would have a loss on my record. You have to know what the odds are when you take a fight, so the odds with taking a fight with Lomachenko, you have to knock him out to win. With me taking that odds, you need to pay me for that." http://www.badlefthook.com/2016/5/3...plains-turning-down-career-high-offer-to-face

    - We know Walters is lying because Lomachenko actually officially lost to Salido in a fight that could have been scored a draw and according to one judge, 7-5 Loma. If it was that close, especially considering the excessive fouling from Salido, you would have expected Loma to be handed the decision, especially given he is targeted as Arum's no.1 prize fighter.

    Walters here is saying clearly that he would lose a decision to Lomachenko.

    Walters wants to act like $550k is nothing. He earned nothing against all of his opponents put together. That guy is no way near a millionaire.

    He would have earned $850k if he won, Walters conveniently doesn't mention that.

    Walters is a FRAUD.
     
    Gannicus, May 4, 2016
    Gannicus, May 4, 2016
    #1
  2. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,918
    241,851
    Nov 23, 2013
    CST80, May 4, 2016
    CST80, May 4, 2016
    #2
  3. KiwiMan

    KiwiMan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,405
    14,596
    Feb 28, 2016
    At least he seems honest about the result against Loma ...
     
    KiwiMan, May 4, 2016
    KiwiMan, May 4, 2016
    #3
  4. Odins beard

    Odins beard Fentanyl is one hell of a drug.... Full Member

    20,458
    12,588
    Apr 13, 2014
    It's a shame because Walters would be Lomochenko's coming out show.

    On paper a tight fight, in reality easy work for Lomo.
     
    Odins beard, May 4, 2016
    Odins beard, May 4, 2016
    #4
  5. Gannicus

    Gannicus 2014 Poster of the Year Full Member

    13,452
    2,990
    Mar 4, 2014
    Gannicus, May 4, 2016
    Gannicus, May 4, 2016
    #5
  6. cslb

    cslb Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,836
    10,108
    Jan 27, 2014
    Seems to me he is saying that he wouldn't get a fair decision against Lomachenko
     
    cslb, May 4, 2016
    cslb, May 4, 2016
    #6
  7. Manfred

    Manfred Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,187
    5,402
    May 22, 2011
    That's exactly what he's saying and I can understand it up to a point,( A iot of bad calls lately) but the bottom line is, he has to take his shot when he gets it. Take it out of the judges hands.
     
    Manfred, May 4, 2016
    Manfred, May 4, 2016
    #7
  8. The Count

    The Count New Member Full Member

    2
    0
    May 3, 2016
    On what basis though? The only disputable decision Loma's been involved in was a dubious loss.
    If he thinks TR were somehow involved in the Sosa draw, that makes no sense given that Arum had his eyes on Walters fighting Loma, and would want it to be as big as possible.
     
    The Count, May 4, 2016
    The Count, May 4, 2016
    #8
  9. Gannicus

    Gannicus 2014 Poster of the Year Full Member

    13,452
    2,990
    Mar 4, 2014
    That's a bunch of BS.
    He is conveniently forgetting that Arum wins either way. If Walters beats Lomachenko, Walters would be seen as the unbeatable boxer, NOT Lomachenko.

    Also, Arum being in control means nothing as Lomachenko wasn't awarded the decision let alone a draw against Salido.
     
    Gannicus, May 4, 2016
    Gannicus, May 4, 2016
    #9
  10. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,384
    7,959
    Sep 2, 2011
    I guess on the basis that Lomachenko is the more promising, younger guy in general, thus they'll want Lomachenko to win more than him.
     
    Cafe, May 4, 2016
    Cafe, May 4, 2016
    #10
  11. Braindamage

    Braindamage Baby Face Beast Full Member

    11,028
    10,075
    Oct 1, 2011
    No way in hell could the Salido fight been a draw! He beat Loma flat out! He was way too big for Loma!
     
    Braindamage, May 4, 2016
    Braindamage, May 4, 2016
    #11
  12. Code Red

    Code Red Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,972
    89
    Aug 20, 2013
    It seems to me that he said PAY ME, so pay him!
     
    Code Red, May 4, 2016
    Code Red, May 4, 2016
    #12
  13. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,557
    18,244
    Oct 7, 2006
    Someone needs to show him the results of the Salido-Lomachenko fight
     
    IsaL, May 4, 2016
    IsaL, May 4, 2016
    #13
  14. Boxing Prospect

    Boxing Prospect Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,249
    5,725
    May 10, 2012
    Can't help but think Walters had the cards loaded in his favour Vs Marriaga...
     
    Boxing Prospect, May 4, 2016
    Boxing Prospect, May 4, 2016
    #14
  15. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Lomachenko will beat Walters, too good of a boxer and hard to hit........

    Lomachenko should have won the fight with Salido................Salido should have been disqualified, but Lawrence Cole was the damned referee, the worst ref in boxing history. Salido hit after the bell, low blows from rd. 1 to 12, hit behind the head and Lomachenko still had Salido out on his feet in the 12th round.....................Lomachenko is the best boxer in the world today.................
     
    Farmboxer, May 4, 2016
    Farmboxer, May 4, 2016
    #15
Page 1 of 2