No boxer weighing less than 200lb can beat Golovkin

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by reznick, Apr 23, 2016.


Page 4 of 6
  1. puncherschance

    puncherschance Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,818
    241
    Jul 3, 2012
    Obviously I mean the man has beaten all time greats like rosado and lemieux!!!
     
    puncherschance, May 5, 2016
    puncherschance, May 5, 2016
    #46
  2. yeyo monster

    yeyo monster Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,198
    937
    May 4, 2012
    Kovo will destroy the bum killer
     
    yeyo monster, May 5, 2016
    yeyo monster, May 5, 2016
    #47
    22JM likes this.
  3. adokei

    adokei Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,864
    158
    Feb 28, 2016
    jesus was around 160 apparently... surely gg would whoop him.
     
    adokei, May 5, 2016
    adokei, May 5, 2016
    #48
  4. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,605
    Jan 30, 2014
    LOL!
     
    mrkoolkevin, Apr 8, 2017
    mrkoolkevin, Apr 8, 2017
    #49
    TheyDontBoxNoMore7 likes this.
  5. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,605
    Jan 30, 2014
    This thread is hilarious. Bump.
     
    mrkoolkevin, Apr 8, 2017
    mrkoolkevin, Apr 8, 2017
    #50
    Pimp C and TheyDontBoxNoMore7 like this.
  6. TheyDontBoxNoMore7

    TheyDontBoxNoMore7 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,432
    2,408
    Nov 2, 2016
    Yeah the dick riding was off the chain.
     
    TheyDontBoxNoMore7, Apr 8, 2017
    TheyDontBoxNoMore7, Apr 8, 2017
    #51
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  7. Braindamage

    Braindamage Baby Face Beast Full Member

    11,466
    10,700
    Oct 1, 2011
    I don't get it! If what you say is true, then why all the crying on about Jacobs coming in on fight night at 180 pounds.
     
    Braindamage, Apr 8, 2017
    Braindamage, Apr 8, 2017
    #52
  8. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,901
    7,643
    Mar 17, 2010
    Jacobs fought a spoiler fight, similar to that of Conn vs. Louis or Braddock vs. Baer. He boxed really cute against a slugger.

    It's not his size that was the issue. When Golovkin actually cornered him on the ropes, two small straight rights folded him like a beach chair.

    This content is protected


    There is minimal leverage on these punches. Jacobs size made him more durable? Please.

    If Golovkin landed a cleaner shot, it would be bad news bears.
    But Jacobs was fighting as a spoiler. And did not succeed mind you.

    The guy who bumped this thread thinks jabbing was invented by Sonny Liston.
    And before that there was just the "paw."
     
    reznick, Apr 8, 2017
    reznick, Apr 8, 2017
    #53
  9. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,605
    Jan 30, 2014
    LMAO. Strawmanning me again? You're as dishonest as you are ridiculous. Can we stick to the topic of the thread though? I'd love to read some detailed fan fiction fairy tales about how Golovkin beats some of the top sub-200 boxers in the world.
     
    mrkoolkevin, Apr 8, 2017
    mrkoolkevin, Apr 8, 2017
    #54
  10. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,901
    7,643
    Mar 17, 2010
    What is this some crusade against me? Have you been plotting all week?

    Golovkin has gotten the better of top sub-200 boxers in sparring. Many of them.
    Each passing year he can only be losing a step.

    But it's hilarious that you think the Jacobs fight diminishes all that, and you bring up this thread from the grave to boast your dumb opinion. Shows how shallow you are and clueless about boxing you are.

    Big 180lb Jacobs fell from two tapping right hands.

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected


    "Fan fiction" :lol:
     
    reznick, Apr 8, 2017
    reznick, Apr 8, 2017
    #55
  11. JoffJoff

    JoffJoff Regular Junkie Full Member

    1,978
    1,498
    Jan 25, 2017
    Is this thread for real or humour?
    I am confused, I read it as a joking exaggeration of the "nobody 154-168 goes 12 with GGG" that A. Sanchez or someone was quoted saying, no?:thinking:

    EDIT/ Just wanted to add I think Golovkin could potentially upset Ward and am a big time GGG cheerleader in general.
     
    JoffJoff, Apr 8, 2017
    JoffJoff, Apr 8, 2017
    #56
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  12. 22JM

    22JM Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,452
    3,929
    Sep 10, 2016
    LMFAO this GG nut swingers we're dreaming big!
     
    22JM, Apr 8, 2017
    22JM, Apr 8, 2017
    #57
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  13. fistsof steel

    fistsof steel Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,202
    3,073
    Nov 13, 2010
    To 168 I would agree...but any further is a stretch...
     
    fistsof steel, Apr 8, 2017
    fistsof steel, Apr 8, 2017
    #58
    pincai and BCS8 like this.
  14. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,605
    Jan 30, 2014
    Then you gave OP far too much credit, apparently.
     
    mrkoolkevin, Apr 8, 2017
    mrkoolkevin, Apr 8, 2017
    #59
  15. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,487
    87,451
    Aug 21, 2012
    I'm a huge GGG fan but I don't see it. There are some real monsters at 200, and at 175 I think the top guys would give Golovkin all he could handle and probably then some.

    I know that this thread was bumped because GGG "failed" against Jacobs - ie failed to KO him like everybody else - but the fact of the matter is that Jacobs is a very good fighter, the MW #2, and he fought the fight of his life against Golovkin.

    And still lost.

    I do however agree with fists of steel that GGG would still cream most if not all the 168 guys.
     
    BCS8, Apr 8, 2017
    BCS8, Apr 8, 2017
    #60
    kk17, pincai and fistsof steel like this.
Page 4 of 6