No dirrell ass kissing please!!!!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by TonyD407, Oct 17, 2009.


Page 1 of 2
  1. TonyD407

    TonyD407 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,333
    7
    Dec 6, 2008
    COME ON GUYS LETS BE SERIOUS :deal

    READ DIRRELLS POST FIGHT COMMENTS HE ADMITS ..........

    ........HE THAT HE COULD HAVE DONE MORE IN THERE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    HE KNOWS HE DIDN'T WIN

    How can he expect to win a world title in a champions home town
    on the back foot with negative running and holding :deal

    so please dont BOMBARED the Forum with stupid comments of
    how the matrix is the future and how great he is

    THE TRUTH is he looked negative against a slow plodding froch
    when he should have shined with skills !!!!!!!!!!!!

    IF HE CANT LOOK SLICK AGAINST A SLOW WORKRATE FROCH
    WHO IS HE GONNA LOOK SLICK AGAINST......stephen hawking:deal

    all week you've been saying how froch was made for dirrell
    and now your saying he was robbed :patsch

    Dirrell has a Long Way to go yet so "PLEASE" Less ASS KISSING !

    He Lost because he didnt do enough against a slow champion.


    JUST BEING HONEST GUYS

    HAVE A NICE DAY:thumbsup
     
    TonyD407, Oct 17, 2009
    TonyD407, Oct 17, 2009
    #1
  2. See Me Flow

    See Me Flow The Pharaoh of Boxing Full Member

    6,482
    2
    Jul 20, 2004
    Nobody is saying the fight was a robbery. It was close fight. The very least a draw. But two judges scoring it 115-112 for Froch? Hell no.
     
    See Me Flow, Oct 17, 2009
    See Me Flow, Oct 17, 2009
    #2
  3. Medicine

    Medicine Boxing Addict banned

    4,277
    4
    Dec 6, 2008
    Froch got owned. Plain and simple.
     
    Medicine, Oct 17, 2009
    Medicine, Oct 17, 2009
    #3
  4. JIM KELLY

    JIM KELLY Bullshyt Mr Han Man! Full Member

    21,349
    1
    Sep 14, 2008
    lookn at this, Talyor was on his way of beating Froch, but he blew out..

    Froch couldn't pull that off o the fresh young Dirrell.
     
    JIM KELLY, Oct 17, 2009
    JIM KELLY, Oct 17, 2009
    #4
  5. Cage

    Cage Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,573
    1,808
    Jan 4, 2005
    im saying Direll was robbed. . . plain and simple
     
    Cage, Oct 17, 2009
    Cage, Oct 17, 2009
    #5
  6. TonyD407

    TonyD407 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,333
    7
    Dec 6, 2008
    We can talk all day about froch's bad points !!!!!!

    thats not the point mate

    the point is everyone is sucking dirrells **** all week about how good he
    is and dirrell "BEGGED" to fight froch first because he should have dazzled
    with his skills :deal

    BUT DIDNT :deal

    stop screeming robbery

    he didnt do enough and admitted it himself :thumbsup
     
    TonyD407, Oct 17, 2009
    TonyD407, Oct 17, 2009
    #6
  7. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Dirrel did nothing but run, hold, fall down on canvas, complain to referee. I dare anyone to claim Klitschkos are boring fighters. Dirrel is a total disappointment.

    Dirrel did not fight period.
     
    Farmboxer, Oct 17, 2009
    Farmboxer, Oct 17, 2009
    #7
  8. Medicine

    Medicine Boxing Addict banned

    4,277
    4
    Dec 6, 2008
    Both Klitschko's are Awesome.

    Possibly in the top 15 heavys of all time....................

    And Froch got his ass whooped tonight.
     
    Medicine, Oct 17, 2009
    Medicine, Oct 17, 2009
    #8
  9. M.I.G.

    M.I.G. and STILL... Full Member

    1,524
    0
    Apr 22, 2006
    I think that he meant that he didn't do enough to win GIVEN THE CIRCUMSTANCES.

    He foolishly underestimated the bias that was in that building and it came back to bite him in the ass.
     
    M.I.G., Oct 17, 2009
    M.I.G., Oct 17, 2009
    #9
  10. JIM KELLY

    JIM KELLY Bullshyt Mr Han Man! Full Member

    21,349
    1
    Sep 14, 2008
    so explain to me what Outclassing is?

    Ok Dirr wasn't no sugar ray leon, roy, hmmmm...

    at soem stages reminded me of a Floyd jnr, he was wicked!!!!! But his holding and other few antics just pampered his statement, but i like what he has to offer.
    Skil, speed, slickness..Froch was a one dimensional bastid!!!

    Dirrell got robbed..
     
    JIM KELLY, Oct 17, 2009
    JIM KELLY, Oct 17, 2009
    #10
  11. warriorking

    warriorking Active Member Full Member

    736
    0
    Aug 19, 2009
    I had dirrell winning by a few points!! But did you see King arthur whoop taylors ass!! Im going with AA to win it all!! He has a punch
     
    warriorking, Oct 17, 2009
    warriorking, Oct 17, 2009
    #11
  12. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006
    Dirrel didnt deserve the win. Seriously.















    so did Froch.
     
    boxbox, Oct 17, 2009
    boxbox, Oct 17, 2009
    #12
  13. the_what

    the_what Bolo Punch KO Full Member

    8,031
    0
    Jul 20, 2004
    Im tired of the "You need to take the champions belt" bull****. Fights are scored on a round by round basis. Doesnt matter if the fight is a 6 rounder or a championship fight. If you win the most rounds, you win the fight.
     
    the_what, Oct 17, 2009
    the_what, Oct 17, 2009
    #13
  14. bad

    bad Active Member Full Member

    854
    1
    May 18, 2009
    dirrell did not do enuff to win.
     
    bad, Oct 18, 2009
    bad, Oct 18, 2009
    #14
  15. Medicine

    Medicine Boxing Addict banned

    4,277
    4
    Dec 6, 2008
    And Froch did?
     
    Medicine, Oct 18, 2009
    Medicine, Oct 18, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 2