Dirrell's corner told him he needed a knock out to win the fight. I do not give points to fighters for running, holding, complaining, falling on canvas. Froch won the fight fair and square.
THIS ISN'T A PRAISE CARL FROCH THREAD GUYS JUST LETS NOT KISS DIRRELLS ARSE BY MAKING HIM OUT TO BE MORE THAN HE IS :deal
Mate i like froch but no way am i a fan of his style or workrate !!!!!!! Im a technical guy and love slicksters/counter punchers im not saying froch was good because froch and dirrell were both shite:deal all im trying to say is lets not clog up ESB with stupid threads on how great dirrell is !!!!! he couldnt shine against slow old man froch who everyone said was made for him !!!!! And Dirrell was giving it the BIG' UN about beating calzaghe atsch **** me !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No dummy, he said that because he knew he wouldnt get a fair shake in England. So, you dont give point for running, holding etc. But you do give point for ineffective aggression, hitting arms, low work rates, getting wobbled, not being able to cut of the ring and being clumsy?
So obviously you give fights to fighters for not landing ****. Because thats exactly what Froch did. Andre landed on several occasions, despite, "running" or in boxing known as avoiding a punch, holding or complaining about being hit in the back of the head several times over and over again. He clearly out landed Froch and clearly won the fight, even with the bull**** point deduction. Oh ya, I forgot, you're the same idiot who was in the forums yelling and screaming about how the Mayweather Marquez fight was fixed from th ebegining and it was all a conspiracy against boxing fans...so i doubt any one gives the slightest **** about what yhou judge fights on moron.
Sure you give points for holding, running and falling to the canvas or didn“t you have Wlad in front against Peter ?