No hate. I just cannot see how Floyd is greater than Morales

When Morales fought Pac, Pac was only prime in age not skills. The only thing he had was a straight left hand. On top of that, the same Pac made Morales sit down on the canvass and submit. That's not exhibiting greatness at all. I don't knock him for that because he knew he was beat but he could have at least stood up. He quit on his ass. Then he lost to Raheem and Diaz, fights that he should have won, truly great fighters don't lose fights in their primes that they are supposed to win.

 

But you're saying that Morales is greater than Mayweather and almost as great as Pacquiao. That would make him arguably the greatest fighter of this era. How can that be if he was past it before the age of 30 with only two noteworthy wins(both were against guys who beat him multiple times)? And people were saying that Morales was on the slide before the first Pacquiao fight.

 

What has that got to do with what I said? The facts are, that Pac wasn't prime all around and made his ass submit on the canvass, and he lost to two fighters that he should have beat. I know that much.

 

To be fair Morales is far greater than Mayweather.

 

Is Morales undefeated and P4P #1 throughout his entire career? Every opponent Morales has ever fought would lose to Floyd! Especially #48

 

Dude YDKSAB!! BLoated or old????

Mosley was lineal champ!! JMM was #3 P4p and Pacquiao was #2 p4p and WBO champ.

 

He just beat fighter of the decade 9-3!! the only 8 division champ. you know that win is greater then a 26 yr old Pac.

 

What is so special about Barrera? Junior Jones disagrees with you

 

:good:good