"No one living today saw Dempsey at ringside, so like it or not, he must be...

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by manbearpig, Dec 28, 2011.


  1. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    255
    Feb 5, 2005
    You could make a similar argument about Tyson, Holyfield and Lewis as to who is tops in their era.

    Since they never really fought each other in their primes, but what would be your point?

    Dempsey, like Bowe, like Holfyfield, like Tyson, like Lewis, was neither a promoter nor a manager, he was a boxer.

    And contrary to popular belief a boxer is suppose to fight the guy his manager and promoters put in front of them. He simply can't start doing the promoters job anymore than the promoter can do his. So suggesting that Dempsey ducked Willis is in my mind a bogus argument.
     
  2. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    Van ,you are a breath of fresh air. The darn haters of the truth pertaining the Dempsey /Wills affair do not want to know the damn truth. It is programmed in their psyche, that Dempsey was a coward, he feared fighting Harry wills so much that he completely avoided him. A freaken
    freaken lie. As any one with no agenda knows Dempsey and Harry Wills SIGNED for the bout with an out of NY State promotor Floyd Fitzimmons.
    The photos of that signing has been on ESB numerous times. The bout was called off because the promotor could not come up with the required purse.
    Harry Wills, pocketed the deposit money which was substantial...The reason Tex Rickard did not promote that bout was very very well known.
    Because of the deadly race riots following the Jack johnson/Jeffries bout in 1910 in Reno, Nevada, in which many people were killed, Rickard refused
    along with the NY State boxing Commission , to match a black heavyweight/white HW title fight. If he was ABLE to do the matching of Dempsey/Wills title bout and rioting and killing followed that bout,
    Rickard would be arrested and through as a promotor. Everyone at that time knew that the risk was not worth the reward. In fact the slow moving Wills was an easier choice then a fast moving celebral fighter that Gene Tunney was. This was reported in many old Ring Mags from the 1930s on, and yet some posters who do not wish to know the truth refuse to accept the facts.
    Hitler once said if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth.
    But thankfully not in this case... Whether Dempsey won or lost that bout
    is open to opinions, but not to deny the real reasons Dempsey and Wills never hooked up, is not debatable...Cheers V...
    P.S. as you stated Dempsey did the fighting and his manager, Jack Kearns and his promotor Tex Rickard, did the matchmaking. That's what they get payed for...:good
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    Firstly, the idea that they directly share an era is not reasonable. Tyson was primed when Lewis wasn't ready; Lewis was primed when Tyson was past-prime. Nevertheless, the two did meet - to what end, i'm not sure.

    Holyfield and Lewis do indeed have more overlap, but they did meet twice. So did Tyson and Holyfield. The timing wasn't ideal, but it gave us a very good idea.

    All of these men fought each other. There is nothing "similar" between this and Dempsey not meeting Wills, at all. Not really.

    Additionally, Wills was such a dominant #1 - in meeting many #1 HW's, Lewis, Tyson and Holyfield proved themselves. Demspey never met the #1 HW during his reign as champion. I don't say it is a "duck", but if it were, it would be the most protracted one in sport's history. To say it's a unique situation is an understatment.

    I certainly wouldn't make that point. My point now is that these men fighting each other a total of 5 times is completely different to Wills and Dempsey not meeting at all.


    Which is why I don't make that argument.

    My point: Dempsey was never tested against the best in his time as champion (and I'd consider Greb the second most likely to test him) and that this leaves, as Magna says, a question mark over him. Whoever's "Fault" it was, whoever you or I want to blame, it is still the case that Dempsey's failure to fight Wills, might - not does, might - render him a shadow-champion. It's hard to be sure - he didin't dominate his era because of this omission.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    Firstly, Wills doesn't appear to have been that slow in his prime. Secondly, Dempsey wasn't even a "prohibitive favourite" over ex-flyweight Carpantier.

    I don't care what hte era is, I don't care what the weight is, I don't care what the circumstances are: if a fighter is the #1 contender for the best part of a decade the champion owes him a shot, and if the champion doesn't give that dominant contender a shot, then we never really know.

    And that fight is always, always worth seeing.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007

    Not only is this something i've never seen said on the forum, it's pretty indicative of the level of paranoia surrounding your view on Dempsey's critics. Who has told this "freaken freaken lie"?
     
  6. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    My girlfriend has given up smoking and is on her period, she's really moody and nearly as bad as Rockysplitnose when you bring up the topic of Harry Wills
     
  7. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,348
    11,388
    Jan 6, 2007
    Cut Rocky some slack, FFS !

    Why is everybody on his case ? He appears to have very difficult and troublesome menstrual periods.

    I'm sure he will become more reasonable after menopause.
     
  8. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,234
    Feb 15, 2006
    Preposterous.

    How many opponents did Shannon Biggs knock out who were world class at the time?

    I think that part of the problem that Dempsey is up against here is that he is facing a two pronged attack against both his record and his opposition. Dempseys crittic go after his record. The bigger is better crew don't go after Dempsey, they go after the larger fighters he beat.
     
  9. manbearpig

    manbearpig A Scottish Noob Full Member

    3,255
    134
    Feb 6, 2009
    It was trolling, and I'm sorry.
     
  10. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Liakhovich
     
  11. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,448
    1,824
    Sep 9, 2011
    Surely Dempsey was one of the best offensive heavyweights ever. Power and punch variety are right up there and I don't think many would out brawl him, maybe Evander or Marciano but I dunno. Defensively he was pants but that weren't his game.
     
  12. RockysSplitNose

    RockysSplitNose Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,271
    62
    Jul 15, 2007
    Don't worry Cuchulain I've got my evening primrose oil at the ready ;-) I've already been vindicated already so I'm calmer now following barefaced pigs admittance of his blatant trollism - ps you are in danger of falling into the SAD SAD LOSER category if you follow McGrain and powderpuff etc on the coat tails barefacedpig
     
  13. manbearpig

    manbearpig A Scottish Noob Full Member

    3,255
    134
    Feb 6, 2009
    Will you just calm the **** down?



    Also, have you read the article I posted? It's good.
     
  14. Conn

    Conn Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,577
    53
    Jun 16, 2011
    i've read the article. it is quite good. and similar critcisms can be made against most or all of the great heavyweight champs.
    None of them quite live up to the hype.
    it would be easy to highlight how Muhammed Ali or joe Louis or Rocky marciano dont actually have the mythic powers or often benefitted from weak opponents.
     
  15. RockysSplitNose

    RockysSplitNose Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,271
    62
    Jul 15, 2007
    As I've said numerous times barefacedpig I am Very Very calm ;-) your the one who keep swearing at people so I think it's you that needs to calm down haha