None of the judges scored the deducted point off Broner last night

That's crazy. How'd they work their math then?

118-108 = 11-1 in rounds for Porter (base 119-109), plus a point off Broner for the deduction and one from Porter for the KD.

So how could they have not included the point deduction and still reached that score? :huh

 

I don't believe the TS worked out the math before he started this thread.

 

They all deducted a point from Broner's overall score(which is still the wrong way to do it).

 

Looking at the scorecards, they just deducted the point at the very end of the fight as opposed to accounting for it in the round by round breakdown. All totals include the extra point, but it's taken away at the bottom.

The site probably could've included a line accounting for the deduction for clarity.

 

They have deducted in the end.

 

Well yeah technically it ought to be an individual 10-8 round but as long as they shave it off @ the end so everything calculates the right way, all good.

 

What a ****en dumbass.:rofl

 

Broner might beat Khan. Brook, though, or Maidana in a rematch? Oh my, no.

 

The 114-112 card is still making me scratch my head.

The only round Broner WON was the 12th in my opinion.

 

:good

114-112 requires having not looked at the ring each round except for the 15 seconds Broner was doing work.

 

Adding a penalty line at the bottom of the scorecard and factoring the fouls in there makes for cleaner accounting as opposed to calculating it on the spot in the round. I'd be in favor of it catching on officially.

Ultimately, it makes sticking to the 10 point must system easier for those wonky rounds where multiple point actions happen and simplifies the judges' job.