I may be in the minority here, but I have NEVER been impressed by Bradley and his performance saturday night didnt change my mind. Some may say that they are impressed because he took Manny the distance. But I think it was a case of what Manny didnt do versus what Bradley did do. Pac never caught him with the type of punches that hurt Hatton, Margarito, or Cotto so that's why he didnt finish him off. IMO, Bradley loses Berto, Ortiz, Khan, & Cotto. I think Cotto walks through him like he did Quintana. Khan (despite his lack of mental toughness during big moments) is a much better offensive fighter than bradley. What do you guys think. I just think he's a scrub.
For ****S sake! Don't you think the reason for that was because of what Bradley do that Hatton, Margarito and Cotto didn't do???!!! He used lateral movement and countered Pacquiao.... He took the power out of Pac's left most of the time, by moving to his left and making Pac have to extend. He never allowed Pac to T off on him, and would duck, bob and weave when Pac would flurry, unlike Margarito and Hatton. I think he is no prime top 90's fighter, he is no JMM or Morales, but he is very equal in terms of ability to Ortiz, Berto, and Khan. I think Cotto is much better than him though, this version of Cotto with movement.
