Not only did Malignaggi lose, he is Ruiz Jr.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BoxingGuru, Jan 6, 2008.


  1. BoxingGuru

    BoxingGuru Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,458
    3
    Jan 21, 2007
    Worst referee in history. How about taking a point from this cheater for holding the whole night.
     
  2. dan-b

    dan-b Guest

    How about not starting a new thread for every comment someone wants to make about this fight but simply tag it on to one of the hundred that are already running?
     
  3. BoxingGuru

    BoxingGuru Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,458
    3
    Jan 21, 2007
    How about you don't make the rules here so don't tell me what to do mr 295 posts.
     
  4. JohnPaul Futbol

    JohnPaul Futbol Member Full Member

    108
    0
    Aug 19, 2007
    I have to agree with you "BoxingGuru", Malignaggi was pretty bad. He should've had a point deducted for all the holding....and the judging was absurd. Malignaggi's a total joke.
     
  5. Benjiabc

    Benjiabc The Nottingham Hitman Full Member

    4,429
    15
    Oct 2, 2006
    i agree. is this the same paulie who wants hatton and a re match with cotto!!!! be real
     
  6. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    no ruiz jr is hatton.
     
  7. Benjiabc

    Benjiabc The Nottingham Hitman Full Member

    4,429
    15
    Oct 2, 2006
    lay off hatton for **** sake you have made your point on numerous threads. getting boring
     
  8. jecxbox

    jecxbox St. Brett Full Member

    7,608
    3
    Aug 5, 2007
    lmfao :rofl
     
  9. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    ok i'm sorry.......
     
  10. Betty Swollocks

    Betty Swollocks James 'Lights Out' Toney Full Member

    5,709
    1
    Jul 21, 2004
    true, he has much more previous for holding and wrestling that Malignaggi has. Infact Hatton's whole style is based around it.
     
  11. dan-b

    dan-b Guest

    Surely you see the logic in what I say? Do you think post counts denote some kind of unspoken heirachy?