Not only did Wilder not lose on the cards, he should have won by ko

How was it a slow count.. Please quote how long a ten count is to last.

Your just too thick to see there is a difference between a 10 count and 10 secs. You can't seem to prove anything!!

 

Go compare and contrast it with his other fights like I have, unless you're too dense to do that.

 

Why are you ducking your Broner KOs Pac thread?

 

No I don't do that I go by rules, black and white. You have stated it was a slow/long count .. How long is a 10 count supposed to last.... Simple question in which the answer proves the point. Go on, again for the 50th time and u refuse to answer how long is a ten count to last?

 

That's irrelevant, what's more important is the fact that Wilder won wider on the scorecards and the fact that Reiss is incompetent.

 

Like I said, go compare and contrast it yourself, but you won't because you don't really know too much about boxing and you're too lazy.

 

You are incompetent as Fury won fair and square and Wilder was saved by two corrupt judges.

Manny shutout'd Broner hahahahahahaaaaa

 

I know the rules of boxing and the rule states a ten count (the ref continues a count initiated by an official ringside) a fighter has til the count of ten to get to their feet and be in a position to defend themselves.

Same as I defended the ref in the wilder ortiz fight as he brought in a doctor before the round started which imo helped wilder but the ref is allowed to do so as stated in the rules.. I have no agenda I have based what I have wrote on the RULES. Something u seem to avoid

 

I really don't think you do and once again the argument is whether or not Reiss administered a legitimate count and overwhelmingly the answer is no.

 

No u think its illegitimate, u said it was a long count but cannot give evidence of this otherwise u would. The rule is a ten count, a ten count is described as someone counting to ten. Nowhere does it state how much time this is to be. So again please explain what an illegitimate count is as there is no specification for time. Just tell me how much time is a ten count. Its the only way you can prove your theory

 

There's plenty of evidence, and you can go see for yourself after thorough compare/contrast. Do your research yourself. I've done mine already.

 

Wrong, Wilder won wider on the cards and Fury didn't get up legitimately brah.

 

How long does a count last? You see I can't seem to see anything official. If you want me to see for myself I would need to know this, its impossible to prove he took too long without knowing this simple big of info.

How much time is in a ten count ? Surely you can answer this simple question as u must know this to have ur accusation.

 

Once again, compare and contrast it with his other fights.

You'll see a vast difference in the way he was counting.

 

Comparing Doesn't answer anything. How much time is a ten count?