noticed something about the broner and malignaggi fight...

Looked like it was fixed, Paulie pulled his punches.

 

Wow i thought *******s had died out but here you are

I scored the fight 115-113 to Malignaggi and thats being generous to Broner

I scored the Pac-Marquez fight 116-112 Marquez

You wanna know what i scored the 4th Marquez-Pacquiao fight? oh yeah thats right Pacquiao got knocked the **** out

 

Anybody who scored that fight for Malignaggi is seriously confused and can never be taken seriously in any boxing discussion regarding the scoring of a bout. Some of these guys should stick to watching amateur boxing with computerized scoring.

For the confused people: There are 4 categories for scoring rounds.

Clean Punching
Defense
Effective Aggression
Ring Generalship

That is it. Adding in your personal bias and "personal scoring criteria" is complete bull**** and has no bearing or relevance on the actual scoring of a professional boxing match.

 

This, I've always called pac overrated and I laughed my ass off when he got K.O'd

mattyssee is a machine and ponce de leon did spank broners ass.

115-113 malignaggi

 

if you're a believer that Trout beat Canelo, you must also believe Paulie beat Broner.

 

i thought it was 6-6. neither guy controlled the fight.

for the record...i thought jmm beat back 2 and 3. i called 4.

i had trout winning against canelo as well.

 

So throwing 2 or 3 punches in a round compared to throwing punches in bunches to force an opening isnt effective aggression?

Broner didnt do enough work to win that fight, he stood there and refused to trade and looked flat footed throughout the entire fight

Paulie showed better ring generalship by moving around on the outside and showing good head movement, he even had enough time to talk to floyd mayweather whilst the round was in place

Adding in your personal bias and "personal scoring criteria" is complete bull**** and has no bearing or relevance on the actual scoring of a professional boxing match - Couldnt agree more with you there mate, shame you dont seem to do it

 

Bolded: If you're not going to talk about **** that actually happened, just stfu clown. Seriously. If I could slap you for being a total clown through the Internet, I would. You seriously deserve to get ***** slapped for being a complete tool with that comment.

You are seriously a blind idiot. Ring Generalship won the fight? That's only 1 of the 3 scoring criteria you stupid ass hat. You make it sound like Paulie was doing whatever he wanted in the ring. You literally didn't say a damn thing regarding the actual fight and what transpired in the ring. Details my friend... but apparently you're too much of an idiot to figure that out. Of course, that requires you to not be blind, stupid, and mentally ******ed to remember the details.

Stick to watching computerized scoring in the amateurs. That's where you belong pu$$y.

Where did I add my personal bias then Fuktard? Clean punching, defense, effective aggression, and ring generalship. That is how I broke it down and you failed to address a single point. You only talked out of your ass about your "feelings" without any substance. If you're going to talk like a man, back up the **** you say with substance. All I see from your post is an idiotic kid who doesn't know a damn thing about boxing.

Maybe you should stick to checkers or something..... boxing isn't your thing.

Facts:

Who landed more punches? Broner
More accurate puncher? Broner
Who landed more power shots? Broner
Better defense? Broner
Who controlled the ring? Broner
And you're a ***. That's the last fact.

 

Looks like you've upset him there jordan, he's resorted to personal insults and abandoned the discussion...

 

There is no discussion to be had. He had zero points and didn't say a single detailed thing about what actually happened in the ring. Yes, I threw insults because that's what he is: an idiotic asshat who knows jack **** about boxing. I talked to him exactly like he deserved to be talked to.

And if you're in agreement with Jordan: You're an idiot too. ***.

 

My post from another thread breaking down the scoring:

If you use proper scoring criteria, there is no way you score that fight for Paulie.

Clean Punching: Broner - Out-landed Malignaggi overall, and landed significantly more power shots. Landed at a higher percentage and Broner's shots were clearly doing more damage than Paulie. Not even close
Defense: Broner - Despite Paulie throwing over 800 punches, Malignaggi only landed at what? 23-24%? Excellent performance by Broner who has catching most of Paulie's punches on the arms and elbows.
Ring Generalship: Push - Both men did what they wanted to in spots. Broner was able to track Paulie down and land some hard counter shots, and at times, Paulie was using his activity and movement to limit Broner's output.
Effective Aggression: Broner - 80% of that ring belonged to Broner as he had Paulie running from ring post to ring post. Broner was able to cut off the ring and land his power shots, while taking minimal damage in the process. Effective Aggression.

Paulie didn't land **** to the body either btw. I don't know what body shots you were counting, but arms and elbows aren't landed punches. On what grounds did Paulie win? What 7 rounds did you give him? "Activity" is not a scoring criteria in boxing...... See above.

Could Broner have done more? Sure... but that is not grounds to say he lost the fight. Broner clearly won. Press Row also had Broner clearly winning and the description from Dan Rafael at ESPN was: "Paulie sounded like slapping a mosquito off an arm when he punched." You talk about how you didn't see the power in Broner's shots (LOL, get those eyes checked), but you saw it in Paulie's shoe shining and arm punching attack? Please.....

Oh and as a final note, that 117-111 scorecard? That is the only judge who had another judge agree with his view of the round in all 12 rounds. A perfect scorecard. It was the most legitimate scorecard of the 3.

The 115-113 for Paulie scorecard? Dude was flying solo in 4 of the rounds with his scoring..... The least legitimate scorecard of the 3.



There you go Jordan. You can shove your idiotic opinion up your ass. You have nothing to say to respond to that and you know it.

Children should be seen, not heard. Now go away, be a good child, and stfu.

 

:rofl

 

you noticed a way to turn this into another dumbass mayweather thread you mean? congrats.

 

But thats the thing that buggs me. I had Trout a clear winner but i also gave Broner the W.