NOW...Everyone should know and understand the definition of a SHOT FIGHTER...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by darryl1914, Nov 28, 2010.


Page 1 of 3
  1. darryl1914

    darryl1914 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,243
    2
    Jun 14, 2009
    ...How in the Hell did Jermain Taylor Lose to 2 of the SLOPPIEST Fighters in Boxing. Answer...HE IS/WAS A SHOT FIGHTER!!! Now hopefully this puts to an end to the rest of the ridiculous number of threads calling Shane Mosley a SHOT FIGHTER!!! Mosley is NO DOUBT Old...But nowhere near a SHOT FIGHTER. No Shame in getting out classed by a Skilled Boxer because those are the kinds of Fighters that Mosley gets dominated by (Wright, Forrest and Mayweather). He Chased the Bigger man for 12 rounds in Mora who chose to RUN from the so called SHOT fighter. Mosley is still a viable opponent at 147-154lbs. He's not the Mosley that he used to be...But Far from Shot!!! Maybe it's good that he's with Top Rank now...Maybe Arum can find some BIGGER, EASY-2-HIT Fighters for him....hint hint!!!
    The Definition of A Shot Fighter is Jermain Taylor..PERIOD. Anytime you get KTFO by 2 fighters with Absolutely NO Skill, NO Movement, AWFUL FOOTWORK and NO Defense (and in the case of Abraham, a low work-rate)...THAT IS A SHOT FIGHTER. Watching Froch vs Abraham last night was just Plain Awful. How does a Fighter with a Low Work-rate and no real Offensive, Defense or Versatility get to be 31-0 and a Belt-Holder? How in the **** is that Possible? And watching Froch throw that shitty-ass jab while continually dropping his right hand was like watching a bad traffic accident...JUST AN AWFUL FIGHT TO WATCH if you a fan of skill, precision, technically ability, speed, defense, counter-punching...you know, BOXING.

    I wanted to jump through my TV and choke the **** out of Antonio Tarver for calling Froch's performance...MASTERFUL!!!:-(
     
    darryl1914, Nov 28, 2010
    darryl1914, Nov 28, 2010
    #1
  2. Donnyb

    Donnyb Active Member Full Member

    1,369
    37
    Apr 25, 2009
    *Yawn*
     
    Donnyb, Nov 28, 2010
    Donnyb, Nov 28, 2010
    #2
  3. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    Dude you sound like a broken record sometimes.

    Jermain Taylor was never hot ****. He had athleticism but average skill and no stamina, and honestly was never the best at taking a punch. I agree that Froch-Abraham was terrible though, when you get outboxed by Carl Froch.... man.
     
    Swarmer, Nov 28, 2010
    Swarmer, Nov 28, 2010
    #3
  4. USboxer1981

    USboxer1981 The Real Def. MVP Full Member

    9,873
    2
    Nov 9, 2007
    You're a ****** if u actually believe this crap...

    Froch has no defense? Abraham was able to hit Dirrell much easier than he was able to hit Froch.
     
    USboxer1981, Nov 28, 2010
    USboxer1981, Nov 28, 2010
    #4
  5. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,564
    83,421
    Nov 30, 2006
    You never provided a definition.

    Anyway, Taylor didn't get KTFO because he was shot.

    In the Froch fight at least, he got KTFO because he was brave and stupid. He should have gotten on his bike and pedaled to a comfortable win over Froch, but no...

    With Abraham, he still didn't have his head right and his confidence wasn't there. The reputation of the monstrous puncher across the ring from him preceded him. He fought stupidly again (and nervously this time), and this time he lost enough rounds that the late KO was academic.

    You can argue he was ruined by the time he stepped in with Abraham, sure. He was not shot when he fought Froch, though. He was 31 years old, coming off an appropriately dominant win over a truly shot Lacy, and winning the fight up until the very last minute.
     
    IntentionalButt, Nov 28, 2010
    IntentionalButt, Nov 28, 2010
    #5
  6. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    Same old same old from Darry

    "white guys cant box and black fighters are supreme"

    This content is protected
     
    Boom_Boom, Nov 28, 2010
    Boom_Boom, Nov 28, 2010
    #6
  7. Gesta

    Gesta Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,975
    9
    Apr 12, 2009
    You are a racist, you know it.

    Always bitching the the black fighters are hard done by.

    Who says these guys have no skill, because they are not black and slick, fast etc..?
     
    Gesta, Nov 28, 2010
    Gesta, Nov 28, 2010
    #7
  8. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,600
    Jul 22, 2004
    This content is protected
     
    Ilesey, Nov 28, 2010
    Ilesey, Nov 28, 2010
    #8
  9. Stickandmove

    Stickandmove Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,710
    2
    Mar 13, 2006
    Jermain Taylor outboxed and outfought Bernard Hopkins in the first half of both of their fights. Nobody has done that to Hopkins since Roy Jones in '93.

    Taylor had better than average skill, come on.

    I agree that his stamina and chin were never the best.

    Was Jermain Taylor shot when he fought Froch? NO WAY. Taylor was winning that fight in the early stages till his questionable stamina became an issue. Taylor was slightly damaged goods (mainly due to the first Pavlik loss) but he wasn't shot.
     
    Stickandmove, Nov 28, 2010
    Stickandmove, Nov 28, 2010
    #9
  10. FORMIDABLE

    FORMIDABLE Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,664
    6
    Jan 12, 2010
    Jermain Taylor lost to Froch and Pavlik because he has no soul. He is empty on the inside.
     
    FORMIDABLE, Nov 28, 2010
    FORMIDABLE, Nov 28, 2010
    #10
  11. alexanderkareli

    alexanderkareli Member Full Member

    456
    2
    Jan 31, 2010
    i dont kno dude. jermain taylor doesnt look like someone whos shot to me . . .

    This content is protected
     
    alexanderkareli, Nov 28, 2010
    alexanderkareli, Nov 28, 2010
    #11
  12. DemolitionDan

    DemolitionDan ATG and HoF Full Member

    17,643
    10
    Jun 29, 2009
    :lol: :roll: :patsch :nut

    Can we change the slogan of ESB?

    How about "Your source for 24 hours of **** posters that cry about everything boxing coverage" this is a shorten version of what I really want to say...or is that still a bit too long?
     
    DemolitionDan, Nov 28, 2010
    DemolitionDan, Nov 28, 2010
    #12
  13. darryl1914

    darryl1914 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,243
    2
    Jun 14, 2009
    Same old Boom....IDOL WORSHIPING!!! Following me everywhere, using my lines, using my gifs. Hey, HOW DOES MY **** TASTE?
     
    darryl1914, Nov 28, 2010
    darryl1914, Nov 28, 2010
    #13
  14. HoldMyBeer

    HoldMyBeer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,346
    6
    Feb 14, 2010
    you dont have one. if you did you wouldn't be typing this **** over the net.
    go and ****ing be somebody in your life instead of becoming this trivial online poster who thrives on baby****.

    tired of having to read **** from people who want to be losers.
     
    HoldMyBeer, Nov 28, 2010
    HoldMyBeer, Nov 28, 2010
    #14
  15. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    I'm gonna be honest- if you've got solid skill and great athleticism, you can outbox an old dude(40!) who's fighting extremely conservatively for a couple rounds.
     
    Swarmer, Nov 28, 2010
    Swarmer, Nov 28, 2010
    #15
Page 1 of 3