Now That Pac Accepted Floyd's Terms....

yes, arum ALWAYS tells the truth, and NEVER does anything shady:

http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1P1-79495456.html

 

Do you want me to real out the 1001 things Bob Arum has lied about in the past? why is this any different?

 

Just because they sent an agreement to Mayweather to sign it doesnt mean that they agreed to what Mayweather wanted. some of you guys are soo ****ing simple. Live alittle, not everything people say is on the level. You along with others ASSume that Pac agreed to drug testing, and he may have, but as far as we know its the same thing that he agreed to last time which was a couple of pre-set blood test and **** test up until the fight. It wasnt good enough then so what makes it good enough NOW. However turds dont see the simple logic in that. in other word same story different day, the ending never changes.:good

 

Say deadline passes and floyd doesn't sign, then floyd reveals pac never agreed for random blood testing up till the fight. Yet arum has publicly gone on record and said pac agreed to all mayweather terms.

What would you say then?

 

What did the whole article say? I can't read it all.

 

Floyd demanding random drug testing ruined the first negotiation, so he ducked Pacquiao. Plays both ways.

 

just an exert about how he bribed the IBF

there are a bunch of links to the story if you google: bob arum bribe

 

I guess you didn't read that "Pac agrees to FLOYD'S terms." He agreed to drug test up to the day of the fight. No excuses now.

 

Asking someone to take the same test as you constitutes a duck

If mayweather asked pac to be tested and he himself wouldn't be tested, that would be cause for concern.

Asking an opponent to take extra testing to be sure of a level playing field is not even a big deal unless of course the person you asking has something to hide:think

 

i guess you didn't read the "says arum"

 

I haven't heard from anyone else except from posters on this forum :huh. Floyd sure as hell hasn't said anything about it

 

And I'm guessing that changing the deal after someone agreed to your terms isn't a duck? :think

 

so yeah, you didn't read "says arum"

even worse, your source is ESB posters? atsch