Now that Pac-JMM 2 is out for now...who will take a 1 month bet..

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PATSYS, Nov 25, 2007.


Page 1 of 2
  1. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    That JMM will still find a reason not to fight Guzman?

    Divac, 4rounder, or any of you Pac detractors. Deal? :deal

    Chances are, we get to see JMM-Juaraez 2 :patsch

    You fanboys have been criticising Pac...let's see if your boy lives up to your standards..:rasta
     
    PATSYS, Nov 25, 2007
    PATSYS, Nov 25, 2007
    #1
  2. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    Patsys I thought you were a better poster than this.

    Why are you trying so desperately to spin this.

    Pac chose to avoid JMM.

    So instead of just admitting it and saying your dissapointed, you are making threads accusing JMM of ducking Guzman, when he was trying take a paycut to make the Pac fight happen? Unbelievable. :patsch
     
    acb, Nov 25, 2007
    acb, Nov 25, 2007
    #2
  3. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    JMM did avoid Guzman.

    And he will avoid Guzman again soon, stay tuned.

    JMM's paycut was an abstract offer. Paycut from what and how much? None was ever concrete and you all acted like JMM would accept 10% purse split. :roll:

    I am only slightly disappointed with Pac fighting D. Diaz because JMM is now feeling the stupidity of his decision long ago to refuse a rematch with Pac for $750K.
     
    PATSYS, Nov 25, 2007
    PATSYS, Nov 25, 2007
    #3
  4. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    Hate the playas, not the game :rasta

    :happy :happy :happy
     
    PATSYS, Nov 25, 2007
    PATSYS, Nov 25, 2007
    #4
  5. maciek4

    maciek4 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,407
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    I was a fan of Pac, no more.

    I wasnt a fan of Calzaghe and I became one when he decided to fight #2 Kessler for 168 supremacy. Pac should do the same.
     
    maciek4, Nov 25, 2007
    maciek4, Nov 25, 2007
    #5
  6. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    Several hugger are posting, but none taking the bet so far..:nut :nut :nut
     
    PATSYS, Nov 25, 2007
    PATSYS, Nov 25, 2007
    #6
  7. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    Guzman has nothing to do with the news today that Pac isn't choosing to fight JMM.

    And this arguement that he should have come out publicly to say how little he would fight for... PacDbest already tried that yesterday and its bunk. Thats not how boxing or busines operates.

    And your last point, about JMM refusing the matchup years ago and being disapointed.. why not hold Pac to that same standard as of, well, now?
     
    acb, Nov 25, 2007
    acb, Nov 25, 2007
    #7
  8. shelterr

    shelterr Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,886
    0
    Sep 7, 2006
    What other fights are there for JMM other than Guzman at this point? He could see if John will come to america to rematch him or fight Valero just to try get another belt. No reason to fight Soto now after his convincing loss to Guzman and no one ever wanted to see the Barrios fight (since Barrios also lost to Guzman, this seemed stupid to me from the beginning). His options are pretty much coming up Guzman to settle who the man at 130 really is.
     
    shelterr, Nov 25, 2007
    shelterr, Nov 25, 2007
    #8
  9. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    Because its got nothing to do with anything.

    Its a diversion, plain and simple, to discussing what is really going on.
     
    acb, Nov 25, 2007
    acb, Nov 25, 2007
    #9
  10. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    Why should I hold Pac against it? He is just returning the favor. j/k :lol:

    Seriously like I said, Pac-Diaz is not my top choice so I am not very happy but I am only slightly disappointed because JMM-Guzman would be a top caliber fight, skill for skill...:good

    If, of course, that fight happens..:hey
     
    PATSYS, Nov 25, 2007
    PATSYS, Nov 25, 2007
    #10
  11. Raden

    Raden Southpaw Full Member

    378
    0
    Apr 21, 2007
    JMM is full of **** just like his nuthuggers...
     
    Raden, Nov 25, 2007
    Raden, Nov 25, 2007
    #11
  12. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    Quality post!

    Do you actualy have anything to say, of value?
     
    acb, Nov 25, 2007
    acb, Nov 25, 2007
    #12
  13. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    Well I am not diverting anything. I agree that Pac took the easier fight in D. Diaz. But nothing wrong with that cause Diaz is no pushover either.

    Satisfied?

    Now, back to the whole point of this thread. GBP has promotional say to JMM and Guzman and Guzman has offered before to fight JMM and recently even calling him out as well.

    JMM will now have to find an opponent not named Pacquiao. Given his career at 126 lbs and the trend at 130, I would bet Nacho will never ever allow JMM to even get close to Guzman. I am willing to bet on this, 1 month or even 2 months off.
     
    PATSYS, Nov 25, 2007
    PATSYS, Nov 25, 2007
    #13
  14. Raden

    Raden Southpaw Full Member

    378
    0
    Apr 21, 2007
    Why are you reacting? Are you JMM?...:D:D:D

    asar talo...LOL
     
    Raden, Nov 25, 2007
    Raden, Nov 25, 2007
    #14
  15. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    Part 1: (More) satisfied

    Part 2: I have no idea what JMM does now. I dont really care either, being that the biggest fight is off the table. Guzman vs JMM would be great though.
     
    acb, Nov 25, 2007
    acb, Nov 25, 2007
    #15
Page 1 of 2