Now who wins prime Calzaghe or prime Ward?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by rorschach51, Jul 5, 2017.


Who wins?

Poll closed Jul 19, 2017.
  1. Prime Calzaghe

    114 vote(s)
    59.7%
  2. Prime Ward

    65 vote(s)
    34.0%
  3. Draw

    7 vote(s)
    3.7%
  4. Just wish Ward would go away

    5 vote(s)
    2.6%
  1. Odins beard

    Odins beard Fentanyl is one hell of a drug.... Full Member

    20,458
    12,588
    Apr 13, 2014
    Glen Johnson wasn't better suited to 175, if he was he wouldn't have gone back down to 168 to compete in the super 6. Johnson is the ideal example of how he was a top 3 fighter in the division who couldn't crack the top 10 in what you claim to be such a weak 168.

    Do a comparison if you want 175 outside of Jones and DM was a much of a muchness in the sense that it was packed at that time with B/C level fighters, I don't know what makes Hall, Harding, Harmon, Woods and Gonzalez so stand out?
     
  2. DonnyMo

    DonnyMo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,606
    2,245
    Feb 21, 2011
    Im not disagreeing with you on Calzaghe opposition. I do disagree on the fact that Kovalev is a BASIC fighter with zero conditioning. Ward and Cal built their resumes on Euro level competition - thats just a fact. Watching Ward get outboxed by Kovalev (and over 20rds of boxing he was out boxed) i cant imagine him solving the puzzle that was Calzaghe.

    And so what about straight right hands? Ward does not possess a great straight right down the pipe.
     
    khaosai galaxi and Odins beard like this.
  3. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,352
    Mar 11, 2016
    He went to the S6 for the opportunity. He didn't exactly have any other options at the time.
     
    Loudon likes this.
  4. Odins beard

    Odins beard Fentanyl is one hell of a drug.... Full Member

    20,458
    12,588
    Apr 13, 2014
    I fully agree and he ran a prime Froch hard, but he made 168 easily and has 5 fights there over a 2 year period.....thats not a guy who is a natural 175lb fighter.

    I'm not hating on Johnson I just think he's the ideal "case" to prove that 175 wasn't as good as advertised.
     
  5. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,352
    Mar 11, 2016
    I've yet to see someone move back down in weight, after a long run higher up, and be successful. Johnson was far from successful at 168, after moving down for the S6 shot.

    There are too many variables to consider to try and use one fighter as proof one division was better than the other. My two cents.
     
  6. Caper

    Caper How about a fair shake? banned Full Member

    10,908
    1,362
    Apr 4, 2005
    I felt similarly at first however after watching both fights it was clear Ward was never trying to outbox Sergey in a traditional level. I believe Ward felt his advantages would come in windows and spurts while kovalev was most comfortable.

    Not sure if you noticed but Wards punches landed hard and effective in pockets during the last 3 rounds, he was banking on Sergey losing steam and that's what essentially happened. There were moments where Ward landed some debilitating body shots directly under Sergeys armpit....everything he did was systematic and based on the opportunities Kovalev presented (sharp sneaky rights hands as soon as the bell rang) while Sergey seemed to push and force his attack rather than encourage Ward to initiate and score. At the time of the stoppage I had Sergey up 4/3 but the momentum was making a drastic shift.
     
    khaosai galaxi, Loudon and dinovelvet like this.
  7. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,860
    10,261
    Mar 7, 2012
    Glen Johnson was a tougher guy to fight at LHW.

    He was a stand in for the Super Six.

    You keep concentrating on 2004. Fine, but again, what about all of the other years?

    The LHW division wasn't stacked. I never claimed it was. But it was stronger than the SMW division from the time of Joe winning his title to the time of Roy losing his.


    http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_1997

    http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_1998

    http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_1999

    http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2000

    http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2001

    http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2002

    http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2003

    http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2004


    Joe missed a lot of guys from those lists.

    Within that time frame, take a look at the recognisable guys that he could have targeted at LHW, which was a weight that he could have made relatively easy.

    Now take a look at who he starved himself to fight instead for peanuts:

    Branko Sobot
    Robin Reid
    Juan Gimenez
    Rick Thornberry
    David Starie
    Omar Sheika
    Richie Woodhall
    Mario Veit
    Will McIntyre
    Charles Brewer
    Miguel Jiminez
    Tocker Pudwill
    Byron Mitchell
    Mger Mkrtchyan
    Kabary Salem

    It speaks volumes.

    Now I'm not naive enough to think that he could have just gone up to LHW and fought any of those guys. We all know about boxing politics etc. But he could have at least made the effort, instead of repeatedly defending his lightly regarded belt against mainly B and C class opposition.
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2017
    dinovelvet and LANCE99 like this.
  8. Odins beard

    Odins beard Fentanyl is one hell of a drug.... Full Member

    20,458
    12,588
    Apr 13, 2014
    Recognised names in as much as they are American? Yes sure you have your Reggie Johnson's, Montell Griffin's and perhaps they bring him more exposure in the USA but again I'd argue that beyond Jones, DM and perhaps Tarver you could put the rest of the 168 against the 175 and have some very even match ups.

    Regarding your insistence that Calzaghe should have gone to 175, let's remember Ward has been at 175 for what...2 years? And he's only fought 2 actual light heavyweights in Barrera and SK. Let's not act as though he's cleaned out the division.

    Ward is still young and he's got some ATG defining type fights if he chooses so in Beterbiev, Gvozdyk, Bivol and the piece of **** from Canada.
     
  9. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,860
    10,261
    Mar 7, 2012
    How is Kovalev a basic fighter?

    Stop being ridiculous.

    You can't say that you can't envisage a scenario where Andre could have beaten Joe, just based on periods of success by Kovalev.

    I can ask: "How does a guy who scraped by a B class Robin Reid and a 43 year old Bernard Hopkins beat a prime version of Andre Ward?"

    Regarding Joe's susceptibility to right hands, it highlights that despite his great speed and volume, he often left himself opened to be countered. So it's not a given that Joe would have beaten Andre, just because of his speed and work rate. Hopkins proved that.
     
    dinovelvet likes this.
  10. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,860
    10,261
    Mar 7, 2012
    Again, it was better than the SMW division where Joe spent the majority of his career.
     
  11. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,860
    10,261
    Mar 7, 2012
    It has nothing to do with them being American.

    I agree, you would have gotten some even match ups. But LHW was clearly stronger, and much stronger than most of the guys who Joe actually went on to fight.

    I am not acting like Ward has cleaned out the division. But he's done something that Joe would never have done. Joe would never have moved up to fight a guy like Kovalev.
     
  12. Odins beard

    Odins beard Fentanyl is one hell of a drug.... Full Member

    20,458
    12,588
    Apr 13, 2014
    Well that's your opinion, but I don't agree.

    Like I've already said I don't know what makes Thadzi, Del Valle, Griffin, Guthrie, Rocchigiani any better than Eubank, Reid, Brewer or Graham or for instance Telesco, Chris Johnson, Harding or Harmon are any way far superior to Girad, Brewer, Mitchell or Butler.
     
  13. Odins beard

    Odins beard Fentanyl is one hell of a drug.... Full Member

    20,458
    12,588
    Apr 13, 2014
    Again this your opinion and not fact.
     
  14. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,860
    10,261
    Mar 7, 2012
    How can you not agree?

    We're talking about as a whole. Sure, you can compare the odd name. But as a whole, LHW was stronger.

    I've listed the rankings for all to see.

    Again, the best fighters at LHW were also better than almost all of Joe's opposition from 1997-2004.

    His actions to remain at SMW where he starved himself to fight B and C class opposition, cannot be defended.
     
  15. Odins beard

    Odins beard Fentanyl is one hell of a drug.... Full Member

    20,458
    12,588
    Apr 13, 2014
    Again Eric Harding as an example a top 3 -5 light heavyweight during Calzaghe's reign as champ....what makes him so good?

    Derrick Harmon a top 10 light heavyweight....what makes him so good?

    Reggie Johnson?.....quality middleweight but at 175? He beat nobody of note outside of Gonzalez who God bless his soul was as basic as they come.

    Now yes you've shown me rankings, but not once have you explained how it was so much better or deeper at 175....not once only by said fighters where better.

    I agree JC had his fair share of easy defences, but he beat 8 current or former champions at 168, 10 in his whole career....now again I'm not disputing that he'd lose to a prime roided Roy Jones but other than him there's not one fighter I'd favour to beat JC.
     
    khaosai galaxi likes this.