NSAC, Allowing Manny a clear pass to violate their rules?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Bazooka, Jun 10, 2011.


  1. s1nn3d

    s1nn3d Sinner Full Member

    767
    0
    Dec 6, 2008
    Did or did not Pacquiao agree to OSDT (with or without cut off date or any other reservations), the drug test that you claim is a deviation from the default rule... Yes or no?
     
  2. s1nn3d

    s1nn3d Sinner Full Member

    767
    0
    Dec 6, 2008
    A superfight doesn't justify having special drug test.

    Freddie Roach having record of training a fighter who took PED's.... then why didn't Mayweather ask for OSDT when he fought Dela Hoya? And using your previous reason, it's also a superfight. So why didn't Mayweather ask for OSDT back then?
     
  3. Concrete

    Concrete Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,982
    2
    Jun 21, 2009
    He agreed to his own version of OSDT(wanted to be notified when they were coming, and wanted a cut off date), which was still a deviation from the minimal requirements.
     
  4. Concrete

    Concrete Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,982
    2
    Jun 21, 2009
    All fights justify having as much drug test as possible without ruining a fighters performance. But there is no justification for an opponent openly accusing another fighter of PEDs.

    He should have, and Hoya should have had Mayweather take one to. He should have had Mosley take one when he moved up to fight him. Mayweather was in no position to ask Hoya who was the cash cow for a drug test though. Mayweather had to give in to every demand that Hoya demanded.
     
  5. s1nn3d

    s1nn3d Sinner Full Member

    767
    0
    Dec 6, 2008
    Bingo! So he didn't cry foul but he agreed to OSDT (his version or not) which you said "was still a deviation from the minimal requirements."

    Thank you. I rest my case.
     
  6. rjamesd1

    rjamesd1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,884
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    But it has to be agreed upon by both fighters! Agreed is the keyword. :hat
     
  7. s1nn3d

    s1nn3d Sinner Full Member

    767
    0
    Dec 6, 2008
    I believe everyone has no objections in making the sport safer through better drug testing.

    A father, a son and an uncle are being tried in a court of law for defamation as we speak.

    Buttom line. He didn't and his "clean the sport" crusade took a backseat.
     
  8. Concrete

    Concrete Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,982
    2
    Jun 21, 2009
    No they still cried foul.

    - Mayweather doesn't run boxing
    - Mayweather has to go to the commission and get the rules changed by the commission
    - We will do what the commission requires us to do.
    - We aren't going to let Mayweather bully us around

    They cried foul acting like victims.
     
  9. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006
    why? what difference does it make? i thought Pac doesnt hit that hard? will the bigger gloves lessen the power of a punch or is it for the protection of the fighters' hands??
     
  10. Concrete

    Concrete Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,982
    2
    Jun 21, 2009
    Him cleaning up the sport will come down to the boxers following suit, not the boxing commission since the boxers will be the ones eventually paying the money for it. The commission won't force boxers to pay for mandatory OSDT and the commission isn't going to pay for mandatory OSDT for the tons of fighters and fights they have. The best Mayweather can do is inspire other boxers to do the same. Which is possible even if it doesn't happen right away.
     
  11. davebenoit

    davebenoit Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,639
    0
    Mar 20, 2010
    Kindly go back to the thread. It's about NSAC's rule on size of gloves not drug tests.
     
  12. davebenoit

    davebenoit Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,639
    0
    Mar 20, 2010
    It will lessen the impact of the gloves.
     
  13. caneman

    caneman 100% AllNatural Xylocaine Full Member

    16,472
    1
    Aug 5, 2009
    Bazooka: NSAC, Allowing Manny a clear pass to violate their rules?

    NSAC current rules:

    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    Do you know how to read? BTW, I thought you didn't believe that it was my picture? I see, you believe if it fits your agenda.

    :hi:
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
  14. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004

    Last I heard from you *******s, Pacquiao was some kind of improved boxing phenomemon. A two fisted demon who could fight aggressive or on the backfoot.......yet you're saying now Pacquiao would be at a disadvantage because he's a puncher.

    Which is it *******......Is Pacquiao a complete fighter or is he the same ****ing puncher he's always been????

    You tards want to have it both ways.:nut




    I do however agree with the premise of your post. Its advantageous to the aggressive come foward puncher to wear 8oz.
    The 10oz glove most likely benefits the better boxer.


    You want to try to be honest for once Pejavan????

    Mayweather is the better boxer, why in your opinion has he not made an issue of glove size for a Pacquiao fight.
    Mayweather is fine with wearing the 8oz gloves vs Pacquiao.

    In light of Pacquiao not accepting random PED testing, why do you think Mayweather has'nt made an issue of glove size when quite clearly 10oz gloves would benefit him?
     
  15. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    so was it impossible for a puncher to be well-rounded? have you heard the term boxer-puncher divac? and btw, you failed to answer my reply to your previous post. :yep