NSAC stands by Bradley and Herrera scorecards!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ecdrm15, Dec 19, 2014.


  1. ecdrm15

    ecdrm15 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,274
    98
    Apr 30, 2008
    :roll:

    "...the judges were in the majority 86% in the Bradley fight and 83% in the Herrera fight. Thats a pretty good job. Julie was in the majority in all 12 of her rounds." :patsch

    "...there were a lot of close rounds." (in the Bradley fight)

    " The judges also told me that Benavidez landed the more accurate scoring blows and did so more frequently than Herrera."

    "I understand where the fans are unhappy and the media saw it differenty." "...these judges are very experienced, and they're trained to watch the entire three minutes of every round." "they are right in front of the action and have a better vantage point than the fans and the media." "theres no vested intrest on the part of the judges as to who wins, while the fans are rooting for one fighter in the other" :admin

    Really?
     
  2. Lopetego

    Lopetego Guest

    they're full of ****
     
  3. markq

    markq Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,453
    7
    Apr 26, 2010
    File a complaint at WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH.com
     
  4. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,177
    27,897
    Jan 18, 2010
    Usually when a fighter gets jobbed the scored rounds in their favor is in the majority. They're not going to score the very clear rounds against the jobbed fighter but the ones that are at least somewhat close.
    That "in the majority" **** is just an easy way to dismiss the obvious.